Climate change denial as far-right politics

How abandonment of scientific method paved the way for Trump

Bibliographic Data

ID12937116
AuthorsGavin Byrne (Northampton Community College, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume11
Issue1
Pages30-60
Publication date2020-03-24
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Human Rights and the Environment (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1759-7188 • E-ISSN: 1759-7196
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.4337/jhre.2020.01.02
OpenAlexW3012570722
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited7

In this article I show that the form of argument put forward by the climate change denial movement in the United States (US) closely resembles that used in Nazi Germany with regard to Nazi racial definitions. Each involves a rejection of scientific method. This rejection inherently lends itself to far-right politics, which is a philosophy of prejudice. The prevalence of such a philosophy in contemporary American political culture, exemplified through climate change denial, has arguably opened the door for a president of Trump's type. Nevertheless, the US Constitution is far more difficult to suspend than that of the Weimar Republic. As a result, US institutional safeguards against a philosophy of prejudice are likely to hold against a short-term assault on environmental justice in a way that the Weimar Republic's constitutional order did not against Nazism's assault on civil rights. The greater threat to environmental protection in the contemporary US situation is the slow erosion of democratic norms by the Trump administration

Abandonment (legal · Constitution · Democracy · Denial · Nazism · Political science · Politics · Prejudice (legal term · Sociology · Weimar Republic · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Law

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access