Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Constitutionalizing in the Anthropocene

Bibliographic Data

ID12937128
AuthorsFloor Fleurke (0009-0001-7338-2498, Northampton Community College, corresponding author), Michael C Leach (0000-0003-0397-2713, Northampton Community College), Hans Lindahl (0000-0002-1333-9746, Northampton Community College), Phillip Paiement (0000-0002-8848-3830, Northampton Community College), Marie-Catherine Petersmann (0000-0001-5665-0211, Northampton Community College), Han Somsen (0000-0003-0446-2408, Northampton Community College)
Year2024
Volume15
Issue1
Pages4-22
Publication date2024-02-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Human Rights and the Environment (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1759-7188 • E-ISSN: 1759-7196
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.4337/jhre.2024.01.01
OpenAlexW4392242771
LanguageEN
References cited1

The Anthropocene thesis, in its rejection of both the modernist separation between ‘humans’ and ‘nonhumans’ as well as in its treatment of ‘humans’ as a singular global geophysical force, presents fundamental challenges to constitutional theory and practice. First, in terms of conceptual and foundational transformations, the Anthropocene provokes the reconceptualization of legal relations as never being limited to human concerns, but as always and already part of more-than-human collectives. These legal relations are organized by the co-agency of humans and nonhumans, in recognition of shared vulnerabilities and in relations premised on care. This reconceptualization demands a new understanding of representational practices that could constitutionalize more-than-human relations as political and legal collectives. Second, emergent technologies such as genetic and climate engineering introduce fundamental questions about regulatory modalities available in the Anthropocene, and the role that law plays in this regard. Such technologies have given rise to the possibility of ‘ruling by design’, by technologically mediating ‘natural’ forces or Earth system processes to achieve pre-established regulatory goals. This possibility raises critical concerns about the remaining role for law in legitimising and enabling such developments. Finally, the temporal dimensions of the Anthropocene thesis cast a critical light on law’s potential for driving radical transformations in (un)governance. In imagining future legal architectures capable of manifesting more-than-human constitutionalism, it is necessary to excavate the historical role that foundational legal principles and institutions – such as sovereignty and personhood – have had in facilitating exploitative relations between and beyond humans

Agency (philosophy · Anthropocene · Business · Corporate governance · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Environmental law · Epistemology · Modalities · Personhood · Political science · Politics · Posthuman · Social science · Sociology · Sovereignty · Engineering · Environmental law and policy · Law · Philosophy

  • Declarations of Dependence

    Open Access•Henrik Enroth•Theory Culture & Society•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae