Twenty years post US welfare reform and state family caps aka child exclusion
An overdue assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12937299 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Diana Romero (0000-0002-4832-9564, CUNY School of Law, corresponding author), Madina Agénor (0000-0001-6675-8891) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 151-171 |
| Publication date | 2018-03-19 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Poverty and Social Justice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1759-8273 • E-ISSN: 1759-8281 |
| Publisher | Policy Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1332/175982718x15200701225197 |
| OpenAlex | W2790447652 |
| Language | EN |
The 1996 welfare reform legislation sought to discourage poor women from childbearing by allowing a family-cap policy prohibiting an increase in cash assistance when a new child is born. We conducted key-informant interviews with officials from all 24 family-cap states on the policy's status, implementation, opinions regarding its effectiveness, benefits and disadvantages. Most stated that the policy's administrative burden and negative economic impact on poor families outweighed its potential benefits. Some states implemented related policies that further undermined family wellbeing and/or did not adopt the Medicaid expansion increasing access to family planning, revealing a punitive social policy of questionable effectiveness
AKA · Business · Cash transfers · Economic growth · Economics · Legislation · Medicaid · Political science · Poverty · Public economics · Punitive damages · Social policy · State (computer science · Welfare · Welfare reform · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|