Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12939253 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher W Tindale (0000-0002-2820-1416, University of Windsor, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 32 |
| Pages | 159-178 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Co-herencia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1794-5887 • E-ISSN: 2539-1208 |
| Publisher | Universidad EAFIT (PUBLISHER • CO) |
| DOI | 10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.6 |
| OpenAlex | W3037810395 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 12 |
The New Rhetoric identifies the self-deliberator as one of three main types of audience. But such a turn toward the self is at odds with studies of contemporary argumentation, particularly social argumentation. Argumentation takes place “out there”, modifying the environments in which audiences operate. Equally interesting is the use of self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy. Arguing with oneself, especially when that self is distanced in some way from the individual involved, employs self-deliberation beyond the ends that Perelman assigned to it. In this paper, my goal is to explore the nature of the self-deliberator as an audience and self-deliberation as a rhetorical strategy employed in argumentation
Argumentation theory · Deliberation · Epistemology · Linguistics · Odds · Persuasion · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Law · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |