The Role of the Russian Orthodox Church in the State’s Promotion of the “Traditional” Family as Part of Family Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12942834 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Светлана Николаевна Русских (Institut national d'études démographiques, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 183-202 |
| Publication date | 2022-02-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Мир России (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1811-038X • E-ISSN: 1811-0398 |
| Publisher | National Research University, Higher School of Economics (HSE) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.17323/1811-038x-2022-31-1-183-202 |
| OpenAlex | W4214611096 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 6 |
Since the 2010s, the Russian government has promoted a family model in its family policy – a heterosexual married couple with three children – explicitly defined as “traditional”. This definition is close to the representation of the family by the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC), which, since the 2000s, has positioned itself as an actor in family policy, in particular through the establishment of “The Committee of Patriarchs on the Family, Child Welfare and Motherhood” serving as an intermediary with the State. I show that the ROC and the State offer comparable family models and that they work closely together in the implementation of family policy. I show how the Russian government and the ROC support religiously motivated actions, including promotional events such as the creation of new holidays and restrictive measures such as limiting the right to abortion. I conclude that the demographic crisis led Russian family policy in the 2000s to combine a natalist dimension with a traditionalist dimension that values a family model based on ROC values. This work is based on official documentation and the results of a field work conducted between 2015 and 2018 in the Ulyanovsk Oblast. I conducted interviews with two categories of the population: officials of different governmental structures directly related to family policy and ROC priests. The choice of this region was motivated by the involvement of local authorities and ROC representatives in the realisation of the objectives of the federal family policy
Dimension (graph theory · Government (linguistics · Political science · Population · Promotion (chess · Serbian · Sociology · State (computer science · Welfare · Demography · Law · Religion and Society Interactions
Les politiques familiales
Petr and Fevronia, and the Day of Family, Love and Faithfulness. Pronatalism and Unstable Gender Order in Today’s Russia
Les politiques familiales
New Pronatalism
Illegal Uses of the Russian Maternity Capital
Pronatalism, Gender Politics, and the Renewal of Family Support in Russia
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |