Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

European Governance After Lisbon and Portability of Supplementary Pension Rights

Bibliographic Data

ID12944004
AuthorsKonstantina Kalogeropoulou (University of Nottingham, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume2
Issue1
Pages75-91
Publication date2007-04-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Contemporary European Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1815-347X • E-ISSN: 1815-347X
PublisherUACES (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.30950/jcer.v2i1.25
OpenAlexW1906502268
LanguageEN
References cited15

The need to remove obstacles for migrant workers was recognised from the inception of the EEC. Regulations 1408/71 and 574/72 were enacted on the legal basis of Article 42 EC, which provides for Community legislation to be adopted in the field of social security in order to provide the freedom of movement of workers. However, in relation to pension provisions, these Regulations cover only statutory pension schemes.3 The issue of enhancing portability of supplementary pension rights as a way of improving workers’ mobility within the Member States has been attracting attention for more than fifteen years.4 Demographic changes and the Community goal of modernising social protection systems have further increased the focus on portability of supplementary pension rights. Nevertheless, at present, a clear legal framework safeguarding supplementary pension rights for EU workers and their family members does not exist. The main reasons for the lack of sufficient legislative measures protecting such rights can be attributed to the great heterogeneity between supplementary pension schemes and the fact that supplementary pension provisions form part of the national social security systems where the Community has restricted competence to intervene, as the Member States are primarily responsible for their organisation. The Open Method of Coordination (OMC), introduced at the Lisbon European Council in 2000, has provided the EU an alternative means, through soft law measures, to address such sensitive policy areas. From 2001, OMC was also applied to pensions. Although its effectiveness is not clear yet, it can provoke interest and engage the Member States towards the removal of hindrances in portability of supplementary pension rights. Alongside existing EU processes and the traditional Community method, portability of such rights may be promoted

Business · Legislation · Legislature · National Pension · Pension · Political science · Safeguarding · Social security · Software portability · Statutory law · European Law and Migration · Law · Polish Legal and Social Issues · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Mind the Gap

    Open Access•Joanne Scott, David M Trubek•European Law Journal•2002

  • Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe

    Open Access•David M Trubek, Louise G Trubek•European Law Journal•2005

  • Pensions

    Gordon L Clark•Pension security in the 21st…•2003

  • The European Employment Strategy

    Stuart Ball•Industrial Law Journal•2001

  • Social Europe and Experimentalist Governance

    Jonathan Zeitlin•EU Law and the Welfare State•2005

  • Is the Open Method of Coordination Appropriate for Organising Activities at European Level in Sensitive Policy Areas?

    Open Access•Desmond Dinan, Caroline De La Porte•European Law Journal•2002

  • Proposal for a Directive on Improving the Portability of Supplementary Pension Rights

    Open Access•Frans Pennings•European Journal of Social Security•2005

  • The open method of coordination on pensions

    Open Access•Martina Eckardt•Journal of European Social Policy•2005

  • Social Benchmarking, Policy Making and New Governance in the Eu

    Open Access•Desmond Dinan, Caroline De La Porte et al.•Journal of European Social Policy•2001

  • Portability of Supplementary Pension Rights in the European Union

    Open Access•Vincenzo Andrietti•International Social Security…•2001

  • EU Employment Law

    Open Access•Ruth Nielsen•Modern Law Review•2004

  • The European Social Model

    Open Access•Fritz W Scharpf•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2002

  • The OMC – a deliberative-democratic mode of governance? The cases of employment and pensions

    Desmond Dinan, Caroline De La Porte et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2004

  • Zajedno stvarajući rast i radna mjesta

    Open Access•Komisija Europskih Zajednica•Revija za socijalnu politiku•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae