The Power Status of Gantimur in the mid-17th Century
Historiographic Interpretations and Historical Realities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12945553 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A S Zuev (0000-0003-2465-380X, Novosibirsk State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 46-64 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Vestnik NSU Series History and Philology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1818-7919 |
| Publisher | Novosibirsk State University (NSU) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.25205/1818-7919-2025-24-8-46-64 |
| OpenAlex | W4415100480 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
This analysis, grounded in authentic representative sources, elucidates the actual power status of Gantimur, who led one of the Transbaikal ethno-territorial groups (nelyud). Gantimur played a significant role in the diplomatic relations between Russia and Qing China during the period from the 1660s to the 1680s. The study substantiates that prevailing interpretations in historiography, which have characterized Gantimur as an influential and powerful member of the military-political elite in Dauria, specifically Eastern Transbaikalia and the Amur region, during the latter part of the 17th century, do not correspond to historical facts. In the 1st half of the 1650s, when Russian explorers appeared in the south of Eastern Transbaikalia, Gantimur did not have any high-power status. The nature and context of Gantimur’s mention in sources clearly indicate that he was only one of the representatives of the potestar elite of ethno-territorial associations (clans) and did not lead any large group of Tungus or Mongols and Daurians. The clans and their leaders who lived in Dauria (in the south of Eastern Transbaikalia and in the upper reaches of the Amur River) appear in the sources clearly as independent from Gantimur. The evidence indicates that, at that time, Gantimur did not distinguish himself from other leaders of the indigenous population regarding political significance. He lacked a high-power status and did not emerge as a noteworthy political figure within the region
Clan · Context (archaeology · Elite · Indigenous · Politics · Power (physics · Historical Influence and Diplomacy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Highly cited | No |
|---|