Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

British Special Services in Interdepartmental Contradictions in the Beginning of the 20 th Century

Bibliographic Data

ID12945563
AuthorsA A Ivanov (0000-0003-4097-9447, University of Veterinary Medicine, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume22
Issue1
Pages20-32
Publication date2023-01-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVestnik NSU Series History and Philology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1818-7919
PublisherNovosibirsk State University (NSU) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-1-20-32
OpenAlexW4317211091
LanguageEN
References cited16

In modern conditions, the problem of the objectivity of decisions taken by politicians is acute, due to the fact that responsible persons often lack reliable information. Since the beginning of the 20 th century, the receipt and interpretation of this information has been within the competence of intelligence agencies, therefore, the success of military-political operations often depends on the effectiveness of their work and the quality of their interaction with other departments. The hypothesis of the study is that, under certain conditions, the ability of special services to influence the politicaldecision-making process is often associated not only with the effectiveness of analytical work, but more with the ability to overcome the resistance of other government agencies seeking to monopolize information channels in the government. The example of the secret services of the British Empire in this respect is valuable as far as the victory in the Great War made the apparatus of this state an object of interest of some other countries, which wanted to bring the level of efficiency and working principles of their security structures in line with the British. Accordingly, not only the advantages of the British secret services, but also their shortcomings, manifested, among other things, in the bias of assessments and distortion of the content of intelligence reports, became widespread in the world

Business · Competence (human resources · Epistemology · Objectivity (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Receipt · Sociology · Victory · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation · Social Psychology · Accounting

  • The First Casualty

    Phillip Knightley•The First Casualty•2004

  • Spies in Arabia

    Priya Satia•Spies in Arabia•2008

  • Operational Lessons of the Mesopotamia Campaign, 1914–18

    Patrick Crowley, P T Crowley•Defence Studies•2004

  • Searching for Sidney Reilly

    John W Long•Europe Asia Studies•1995

  • The Foreign Office and political intelligence 1918–1920

    Open Access•Erik Goldstein•Review of International Studies•1988

  • VIII. The Erosion of Foreign Office Influence in the Making of Foreign Policy, 1916–1918

    Open Access•Roberta M Warman•The Historical Journal•1972

  • The Failure of British Counter-Espionage against Germany, 1907–1914

    Open Access•Nicholas Hiley•The Historical Journal•1985

  • Germans in Britain During the First World War

    Open Access•Panikos Panayi•Historical Research•1991

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae