Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mammoth Figure from Ust’-Kova Site

Results of Microscopic Study

Bibliographic Data

ID12946154
AuthorsPavel Volkov (0000-0001-9303-4565, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, corresponding author), L V Lbova (0000-0003-4103-7785, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography), Yu S Gubar (0000-0002-1799-8327, Novosibirsk State University), O L Shvets (0000-0003-4156-4956, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography)
Year2018
Volume17
Issue7
Pages56-66
Publication date2018-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVestnik NSU Series History and Philology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1818-7919
PublisherNovosibirsk State University (NSU) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.25205/1818-7919-2018-17-7-56-66
OpenAlexW2946310862
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Purpose. The Ust’-Kova site is one of the most famous Upper Paleolithic multi-layered sites of the Northern Angara region in which ivory artifacts were found. The postulate that works of art could play a decisive role in highlighting local differences in the Upper Paleolithic of Eurasia remains a topical one. This figure of the mammoth is a rare case of a zoomorphic Paleolithic image in general and a unique image of this animal in a Siberian archaic tradition, in comparison with the known images found in Europe and on the Russian Plain. Restoration work on this unique figure of the mammoth opened up new possibilities for a comprehensive microscopic study related to the technology of manufacturing art figures and the analysis of paints on their surface. Results. To determine the elemental composition of paint on the surface of the figure, we used the scanning electron microscopy method and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. This allowed us to study the microstructure of the paint, determine the elemental composition of the pigment in the sample and its quantitative indices. We distinguished black paint with domination of manganese, iron and magnesium and red paint with the dominance of chlorine, phosphorus, alum inosilicates, iron, manganese. In the latter case, we definitely identify an artificial pigment, as indicated by a wide range of additives. Conclusion. As a result of experimental and technological research, we established that the process of making the figure occurred in several stages. On every stage we reveal peculiarities of using the tools. High efficiency of the manufacturer's work is evident due to using the minimum of the tool kit, only a planning knife and a pair of cutters. Small details of the figure remained unworked. They are unlikely to be a consequence of the personal abilities of the work of the ancient master. The master did not use such tools as a carver or a simple drill. This can be considered a characteristic detail of the process of manufacturing. Relative primitiveness of the item is probably due to the scantiness of the toolkit and the relatively low level of technology development during the period studied. In general, the figurative art of the Ust’-Kova site is characterized by geometrized stylization, primitive surface treatment, lack of detail and ornamentation, which gives it a peculiar individuality

Archaeology · Art · Mammoth · Upper Paleolithic · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · History · Materials Science · Mineralogy and Gemology Studies · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Geology

  • The History of Pigment’s Studies of the Paleolytic (materials, methods, concepts)

    Open Access•Yulia Gubar, Yu S Gubar et al.•Teoriya i praktika arkheologicheski…•2021

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae