Food Security” versus Cash Transfers
Comparative Analysis of Social Security Approaches in India and Brazil
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12947980 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carter Vance (Carleton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2018-05-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Human Security (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1835-3800 • E-ISSN: 1835-3800 |
| Publisher | Librelloph (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.12924/johs2018.14010005 |
| OpenAlex | W2802215722 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 22 |
Amongst Global South nations grappling with the problems of both food security and poverty relief, two of the largest are Brazil and India. Though the nations of course differ in a host of socioeconomic, cultural and geopolitical respects, they do face similar problems of sharp income inequality, displacement of rural populations into cities and increasing battles over land and agricultural ownership. At the same time, both countries have had, until recently, a long period of sustained economic growth, as well as centre-left governments (the Workers’ Party in the case of Brazil, the Indian National Congress in the case of India), attempting to spread the benefits of that growth to a wider social strata. The differential approaches that the social security systems in each nation took in attempting to address the problem of food security are, therefore, instructive in understanding how these questions should be approached on a policy level. Though of course constrained in each case by differing economic and political contexts, as well as path dependencies within each country’s existing social protection regime, there are lessons in their successes and failures. Moreover, an approach which would recognize the best aspects of each policy program could be instrumental in designing a food security policy which reconciles institutional and individual problem levels. This paper will examine the political logics which informed both approaches, with an eye to seeing how these were played out in their concrete effects as implemented
Agriculture · Cash crop · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Food security · Geography · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Population · Poverty · Social security · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · Agricultural risk and resilience · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Law
To Make Live or Let Die? Rural Dispossession and the Protection of Surplus Populations
Bolsa Família
Estado nutricional dos beneficiários do Programa Bolsa Família no Brasil - uma revisão sistemática
Impact of the Bolsa Família program on food availability of low-income Brazilian families
Qualidade da alimentação
Changes in food consumption among the Programa Bolsa Família participant families in Brazil
Putting Food Sovereignty to Work
Sovereignty in a Changing World
Extending Social Security to the Excluded
Eating words
Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change
Mothers at the Service of the New Poverty Agenda
A Relational Approach to Durable Poverty, Inequality and Power
The Uses of Neoliberalism
Trading Out of the Global Food Crisis? The World Trade Organization and the Geopolitics of Food Security
From Fome Zero to Bolsa Família
Power and Distributional Regimes
The birth of bio-politics
Food sovereignty
Is there a global environmental justice movement
Food sovereignty in Ecuador
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |