Action research and the problem of the single case
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12949706 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bjørn Gustavsen (0000-0003-2339-2943, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 1-2020 |
| Pages | 77-82 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-20 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | IJAR – International Journal of Action Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1861-1303 • E-ISSN: 1861-9916 |
| Publisher | Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3224/ijar.v16i1.07 |
| OpenAlex | W3018746882 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 6 |
In his article in Volume 7, No.2 of Concepts and Transformation, Greenwood lays the ground for a self-critical review of action research. This is very much called for, but there is a need to avoid this review becoming a revival of yesterdays “famous cases”. Major parts of today’s action research is oriented towards social movements, learning regions and other levels of organisation far beyond the small group. The associated research challenges can be met only by developing new research platforms and seeking new alliances with other branches of research
Action (physics · Action research · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Management science · Political science · Sociology · Transformation (genetics · Community Development and Social Impact · Computer Science · Engineering · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |