Reconciling Trade and Environmental Protection in Asean-China Relations
More than Political Window Dressing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12952935 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jorn Dosch (0000-0003-1851-6032, University of Modern Sciences, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 7-29 |
| Publication date | 2011-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1868-1034 • E-ISSN: 1868-4882 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/186810341103000202 |
| OpenAlex | W1579423699 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 9 |
Has the growing pro-environment rhetoric in ASEAN-China relations resulted in the effective mainstreaming of environmental issue into trade agreements and multilateral cooperation frameworks? The article discusses the cases of the ASEAN China Free Trade Area (ACFTA) and the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) and argues that there is no shortage of national and regional policy agendas that visibly link trade growth and environmental considerations. However, this nexus is still a weak one in terms of implementation and effectiveness. The most promising initiatives towards an effective reconciliation of trade growth and environmental sustainability are promoted and often driven by foreign donors, most prominently the European Union (EU)
China · Commercial policy · Economics · European union · International trade · Nexus (standard · Political science · Politics · Sustainability · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Global trade and economics · International Development and Aid
Internationales Umweltrecht in Südostasien. Vom Asean-Way zur aktiven Gestaltung regionalen und globalen Umweltvölkerrechts?
Contemporary Security Studies
In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty Industry in the World Economy, 1960 to 1995
Trade and environment negotiations in the WTO
Between Adapting and Shaping
Transboundary River Cooperation and the Regional Public Good
| Citations per year | 0.27 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2023 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |