Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Soft’ Coercive Diplomacy versus Informal Resistance

Attempts at Deporting ‘Illegal Vietnamese’ from Reunifying Germany, 1990-1995

Bibliographic Data

ID12953751
AuthorsMatthias Maass (Yonsei University, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume9
Issue3
Pages221-252
Publication date2014-08-29
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Hague Journal of Diplomacy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1871-1901 • E-ISSN: 1871-191X
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/1871191x-12341287
OpenAlexW2027326561
LanguageEN
References cited3

During the period of Germany’s reunification in the early 1990s, disagreement between Germany and Vietnam over the return of Vietnamese individuals to Vietnam escalated into a diplomatic dispute that also spilled over into Vietnam’s negotiations with the European Union over a major eu –Vietnam treaty. In mid-1995, however, the German and Vietnamese governments finally agreed on a repatriation arrangement that allowed Germany to begin deporting about 40,000 Vietnamese who were living in Germany illegally. This article explores the episode in the wider context of diplomatic dispute resolution. While Germany was demanding full cooperation from Vietnam on the issue of returning Vietnamese nationals, the Vietnamese government initially resisted large-scale repatriation for economic and social reasons. Hanoi attempted to frame the discussion within bilateral negotiations, economic costs and human rights, whereas Bonn argued from the perspective of customary international law and applied increasingly coercive diplomacy. German authorities escalated the disagreement and made economic threats with the aim of changing Hanoi’s behaviour. In order to frame this approach analytically, this article uses a modified form of coercive diplomacy. The analysis proceeds in three stages: first, the article analyses the origins of the dispute, which had its roots in German reunification; second, it evaluates the legal arguments advanced by each side; and third, it investigates Germany’s ‘soft’ coercive diplomacy and Vietnam’s response. The article concludes with an evaluation of Germany’s approach, benchmarking 1995’s diplomatic outcome against results on the ground, namely the number of returnees to Vietnam

Diplomacy · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Repatriation · Sociology · Vietnamese · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · International Law and Aviation · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law

  • The Two Viet-Nams

    Bernard B Fall, Bernard Fall•Two Vietnams•2019

  • The Limits of Unilateral Migration Control

    Open Access•Antje Ellermann•Government and Opposition•2008

  • Antiminority Riots in Unified Germany

    Roger Karapin•Comparative Politics•2002

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae