Modular Ontologies for Genetically Modified People and their Bioethical Implications
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12954231 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Derek So (0000-0002-8211-3222, McGill Genome Centre, autor correspondente), Robert Sladek (0000-0002-2730-1204, McGill Genome Centre), Yann Joly (0000-0002-8775-2322, McGill Genome Centre) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 9-9 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | NanoEthics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1871-4757 • E-ISSN: 1871-4765 |
| Editora | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11569-024-00459-4 |
| PMID | 39170757 |
| OpenAlex | W4401708808 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 260 |
Participants in the long-running bioethical debate over human germline genetic modification (HGGM) tend to imagine future people abstractly and on the basis of conventionalized characteristics familiar from science fiction, such as intelligence, disease resistance and height. In order to distinguish these from scientifically meaningful terms like "phenotype" and "trait," this article proposes the term "persemes" to describe the units of difference for hypothetical people. In the HGGM debate, persemes are frequently conceptualized as similar, modular entities, like building blocks to be assembled into genetically modified people. They are discussed as though they each would be chosen individually without affecting other persemes and as though they existed as components within future people rather than being imposed through social context. This modular conceptual framework appears to influence bioethical approaches to HGGM by reinforcing the idea of human capacities as natural primary goods subject to distributive justice and supporting the use of objective list theories of well-being. As a result, assumptions of modularity may limit the ability of stakeholders with other perspectives to present them in the HGGM debate. This article examines the historical trends behind the modular framework for genetically modified people, its likely psychological basis, and its philosophical ramifications
Bioethics · Biology · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Modular design · Ontology · Philosophy of science · Philosophy of technology · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Computer Science · Engineering · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Philosophy · Genetics
The Case against Perfection
Political Biology
Biomedical Platforms
Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse
Genethics
From Chance to Choice
Science, Truth, and Democracy
Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening
The Interplay of Subjective Essentialism and Entitativity in the Formation of Stereotypes
Culture and cognition
In Defense of Posthuman Dignity
Essentialist beliefs about social categories
Prototypes in Person Perception
Psychological Essentialism of Human Categories
The looping effects of human kinds
Level of Categorization and Content of Gender Stereotypes
The Moral Obligation to Create Children With the Best Chance of the Best Life
Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
In the Name of Eugenics
Social Justice in the Liberal State
Bodies of Tomorrow
Anarchy, State, and Utopia
A Theory of Justice
The Ridicule of Time
The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being
Equality, Liberty, and Perfectionism.
Beyond safety
From goodness to good looks
Half a century of bioethics and philosophy of medicine
Well-being
A Not‐So‐New Eugenics
Reprogenetics and the “Parents Have Always Done It” Argument
Special Supplement
Biotechnology and Monstrosity
Parenting in an Era of Genetics
Crowdsourcing the Moral Limits of Human Gene Editing
Religion and the Secularization of Bioethics
Toward a Philosophy of Technology
Genetic Engineering and Social Justice
Liberal Eugenics
Children of Choice
The Politics of Life Itself
What does the Schema Concept Buy us
Germline genetic modification, CRSIPR, and human identity
Enhancing the Species
Genome editing
Eugenics
The platforming of human embryo editing
Assessing public opinions on the likelihood and permissibility of gene editing through construal level theory
Bioethics and the Reinforcement of Socio-technical Expectations
Designing Babies
Visions and Ethics in Current Discourse on Human Enhancement
Perfecting Human Futures
What Counts as “Success” in Speculative and Anticipatory Ethics? Lessons from the Advent of Germline Gene Editing
If and Then
Whereto speculative bioethics? Technological visions and future simulations in a science fictional culture
Science fiction authors’ perspectives on human genetic engineering
Science fiction in bioethics
Questioning the sci‐fi alibi
Compressed Foresight and Narrative Bias
The Case of the Missing Hand
Genetically Modified Athletes
Germ-Line Angst and Uncertain Futures
Enhancing genetic virtue
Living laboratories
Having Children
Redesigning Life
Health as a Theoretical Concept
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Probability as a psychological distance
The effect of distance-dependent construals on schema-driven impression formation
Is the Future more or less Human? Differing Views of Humanness in the Posthumanism Debate
Nanotechnology in the Age of Posthuman Engineering
The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions
Traits and social stereotypes
The basic level in personality-trait hierarchies
The effects of psychological distance on abstraction
The Ethics of Genetic Control--Ending Reproductive Roulette
Human germline genome editing and broad societal consensus
Questioning the proposed translational pathway for germline genome editing
The Phenotype/Genotype Distinction and the Disappearance of the Body
Genetic essentialism
Genes and the Bioimaginary
Donor Insemination
Simians, Cyborgs, and Women
Born and Made
Culture and Cognition
The Possession of Kuru
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |