Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Forum Debate on Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen’s Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography

Bibliographic Data

ID12955012
AuthorsFrank Ankersmit (University of Groningen, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume11
Issue1
Pages1-10
Publication date2017-03-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the Philosophy of History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1872-261X • E-ISSN: 1872-2636
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/18722636-12341360
OpenAlexW2602273752
LanguageEN

Is narrativism dead or still alive? Have all questions occasioned by the historical text been answered, so that philosophers of history must now turn to other problems? Or did narrativist philosophy of history have its blind spots that now demand their scrutiny? And if the historical text still has its secrets and mysteries, is narrativism capable of dealing with them? Or would we need for this a ‘postnarrativist’ approach? And, if so, what will this new approach look like and what can we expect from it? These are the questions put on the agenda by Kukkanen’s Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography (2015). In this forum debate five scholars (Brian Fay, Eugen Zelenak, Anton Froeyman, Frank Ankersmit and Daniel Fairbrother) comment on Kuukkanen’s book. Pragmatism proves to be an important clue to their findings

Epistemology · Historiography · Medieval history · Philosophy of history · Political science · Pragmatism · Scrutiny · Theology · Classics · History · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, History, and Historiography

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae