Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Participation of Children Involved in the Child Protection System – Validation of the Meaningful Participation Assessment Tool (MPAT)

Bibliographic Data

ID12959591
AuthorsFloor Middel (0000-0001-6276-5701, University of Groningen, corresponding author), Wendy J Post (0000-0002-4290-6287, University of Groningen), Mónica López López (0000-0002-9419-578X, University of Groningen), Hans Grietens (0000-0002-8849-3430, KU Leuven)
Year2020
Volume14
Issue2
Pages713-735
Publication date2020-09-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChild Indicators Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1874-8988 • E-ISSN: 1874-897X
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s12187-020-09772-2
OpenAlexW3087292368
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited29

Children have the right to participate in child protection investigations. Although research suggests that participation is related to positive outcomes of children in the child protection system, children’s participation is not always facilitated in practice. Therefore, it is important to validate tools that can be used to further investigate children’s participation. We examined the psychometric properties (i.e., reliability, internal validity, and external validity) of the Meaningful Participation Assessment Tool (MPAT), which measures the degree in which child protection professionals enable children’s participation in child protection investigations. The MPAT is based on the Model of Meaningful Participation (Bouma et al. 2018) and distinguishes three domains of children’s participation in child protection: 1) informing, 2) hearing, and 3) involving in decision-making. It consists of 13 items. We validated the MPAT based on data from 292 child protection cases. We concluded that the MPAT was reliable, internally valid and externally valid. The MPAT’s reliability was reflected by substantial Cohen’s Kappa coefficients ranging from .63 to .92. The Mokken scale analysis revealed a strong scale of 8 items ( H = .70, Rho = .89). Items on seeing and hearing children about child protection topics seemed relatively more easy to achieve compared to items on providing children with information, which suggests that child protection workers may struggle most with informing children. Lastly, we concluded that the MPAT might be externally valid because we found higher MPAT scores for subgroups based on child protection institution, age, and gender, which was in line with our expectations

Child protection · Developmental psychology · Early childhood education · Reliability (semiconductor · Scale (ratio · Applied Psychology · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child Welfare and Adoption · Children's Rights and Participation · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Honoring the Voices of Youth in Out-of-Home Care

    Open Access•Claudia Equit, Elisabeth Thomas•International Journal of Child…•2025

  • Participation in the Child Protection Assessment

    Open Access•Kadi Lauri, Karmen Toros et al.•Child and Adolescent Social Work…•2021

  • The Relation Between Children's Participation in Their Daily life and Their Subjective Well-Being

    Open Access•Hanita Kosher•Child Indicators Research•2023

  • How Are Leadership Programs Empowering Our Vulnerable Children and Youth? A Scoping Review

    Open Access•Kirsty Bastable, Paul Cooke et al.•Social Sciences•2022

  • Children’s voices in child welfare assessment. An exploratory quantitative study of children’s participation in Norwegian child welfare expert reports

    Open Access•Polly Evans Mcginn, Dag Nordanger et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2025

  • Predictors of child participation in child welfare emergency placements—A Norwegian case file study

    Open Access•May Gresdahl, Halvor Fauske et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2023

  • Children's participation in child protection—How do practitioners understand children's participation in practice

    Open Access•Elise Woodman, Steven Roche et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2022

  • Failures in the Child Perspective

    Open Access•Sylwia Koziel, Lill Hultman et al.•The International Journal of…•2023

  • Think Big

    Open Access•Katitza Marinkovic Chavez, Lisa Gibbs et al.•American Journal of Community…•2022

  • Children's Participation in Child-protection Processes as Experienced by Foster Children and Social Workers

    Pirjo Pölkki, Riitta Vornanen et al.•Child Care in Practice•2012

  • Meaningful participation for children in the Dutch child protection system

    Open Access•Helen Bouma, Mónica López López et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•2018

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

  • Stepping Back from ‘The Ladder’

    Roger A Hart•Participation and learning•2008

  • Participation and health - a research review of child participation in planning and decision-making

    Open Access•Svein Arild Vi, Astrid Strandbu et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2011

  • A Review of Children’s Rights Literature Since the Adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child

    Open Access•Didier Reynaert, Maria Bouverne-de-Bie et al.•Childhood•2009

  • (Re)examining the Relationship Between Children’s Subjective Wellbeing and Their Perceptions of Participation Rights

    Open Access•K Lloyd, Lesley Emerson•Child Indicators Research•2016

  • Children's participation in school grounds developments

    G Mannion•International Journal of…•2003

  • You've got to trust her and she's got to trust you’

    Open Access•Jeanette Cossar, Marian Brandon et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2014

  • My life in care

    Open Access•Caroline Leeson•Child & Family Social Work•2007

  • Illusion of inclusion

    Noam Peleg•Australian Journal of Human Rights•2018

  • Measuring Young People’s Participation in Decision Making

    Anthony Charles, Kevin Haines•The International Journal of…•2014

  • Case file analyses in child protection research

    Open Access•Witte, Susanne Witte•Children and Youth Services Review•2019

  • Listening to the voices of children in decision-making

    Open Access•M Àngels Balsells, M Ángeles Balsells et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2017

  • Seeing eye to eye or not? Young people's and child protection workers' perspectives on children's participation within the Dutch child protection and welfare services

    Open Access•Ganna G Van Bijleveld, Christine Dedding et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2014

  • We are merchandise on a conveyer belt”

    Open Access•Katrin Križ, Dakota Roundtree-Swain•Children and Youth Services Review•2017

  • Child Welfare as Justice

    Gavin Davidson, Lisa Bunting et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2017

  • Young People's Views of the Child Protection System in Scotland

    R C Woolfson, Richard Woolfson et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2010

  • The Impact of Audit on Social Work Practice

    Emily R Munro, E Munro•The British Journal of Social Work•2004

  • A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

    Sherry R Arnstein•Journal of the American Institute…•1969

  • Rethinking Child Policy Post-UN Convention on the Rights of the Child

    Open Access•Maria Heimer, Joakim Palme•Journal of Social Policy•2016

Unique citing works9
Citations per year1,8
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae