Key Aspects of Combined Thinking of the brics Countries on the Responsibility to Protect
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12960587 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Svetlana Bokeriya (0000-0002-9052-4363, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 336-354 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Responsibility to Protect (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1875-984X • E-ISSN: 1875-9858 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/1875-984x-20200003 |
| OpenAlex | W3026215290 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
This article analyses the key aspects of the brics countries’ joint position on the ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) concept, as well as the degree of their influence on transforming R2P into a global norm. The author’s aim was to answer the following questions: What interconnection is there between the brics and R2P discourses? How can brics stimulate an alternative interpretation of the R2P idea? In terms of cross-border partnerships, is R2P-based cooperation possible within the brics framework, and are states ready to expand it in the future? brics member states have demonstrated several common approaches to R2P, including their reliance on mechanisms strengthening the role of the state, their support for the UN position on peaceful conflict settlement, and preventive diplomacy
Business · China · Diplomacy · International law · Interpretation (philosophy · Law and economics · Norm (philosophy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |