The Politics of Norm Glocalisation

Limits in Applying r2p to Protecting Children

Bibliographic Data

ID12960743
AuthorsJochen Prantl (0000-0001-8920-447X, Australian National University, corresponding author), Ryoko Nakano (0000-0002-9747-1743, Kanazawa University, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume10
Issue1-2
Pages97-120
Publication date2018-03-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Responsibility to Protect (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1875-984X • E-ISSN: 1875-9858
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/1875984x-01001006
OpenAlexW2793847320
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Two-thirds of the global child population lives in countries affected by violent and high-intensity conflict. International humanitarian law provides broad protection for children in the event of armed conflict. However, as the 2017 report of the un Secretary-General on children and armed conflict stresses, the scale and severity of grave violations has increased. This paper addresses the central puzzle of why the existing legal and normative frameworks of child protection have achieved so little, in addressing the marginalisation and disempowerment of children in armed conflict. We argue that the contemporary application of r 2 p in protecting children will be limited unless at least two fundamental challenges are met: (a) taming power politics; and (b) squaring inherent contradictions between the global r 2 p norm and national and regional normative frameworks of child protection. We highlight the case of Japan to illustrate the limits of the contemporary application of r 2 p in protecting children

Armed conflict · Child protection · Glocalization · Human rights · International humanitarian law · International law · Norm (philosophy · Normative · Political science · Politics · Population · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub