Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The un Secretary-General and the Forgotten Third r2p Responsibility

Bibliographic Data

ID12960897
AuthorsSrinjoy Bose (0000-0003-2281-8447, Durham University, corresponding author), Ramesh Thakur (0000-0002-2441-8108, Australian National University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume8
Issue4
Pages343-365
Publication date2016-10-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Responsibility to Protect (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1875-984X • E-ISSN: 1875-9858
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/1875984x-00804003
OpenAlexW2568043361
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited4

The responsibility to rebuild needs to be re-elevated to prominence as an integral component of r2p : conceptually, normatively and operationally; and its institutional homes in the un system and the Secretary-General’s role clarified. The 2009 three pillar formulation of r2p works well in most contexts, but is problematic in that it buries and loses sight of the critical importance of the original iciss third ‘responsibility to rebuild’ and reconstruct war-raved societies to the point of being viable and self-sustaining once again. We derive some key lessons from the major international interventions of the twenty-first century and recall the context in which r2p was originally formulated in order to highlight the distinctive features of its contribution to international policy. We then describe three dimensions of the responsibility to rebuild – recovery, reconstruction and reconciliation – and the strategies and steps needed for the rebuilding agenda. Recalling that Security Council authorisation of r2p coercive operations is a nonnegotiable prerequisite, we suggest that the responsibility to rebuild can be reintroduced and implemented through the administrative and political leadership roles of the Secretary-General

Context (archaeology · General assembly · Human rights · International law · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security

  • The Responsibility to Protect the Civilians of Gaza

    Open Access•Anne Crowley‐vigneau, Andrey Baykov et al.•International Peacekeeping•2024

  • Is R2P still controversial? Continuity and change in the debate on ‘humanitarian intervention’

    Noele Crossley•Cambridge Review of International…•2018

  • The Responsibility to Protect

    Open Access•Adrian Gallagher, Blake Lawrinson et al.•Global Responsibility to Protect•2023

  • United Nations “Policy”

    Open Access•Ramesh Thakur, Thomas G Wei•International Studies Perspectives•2009

  • The Dynamics of Elite Networks and Patron–Client Relations in Afghanistan

    Timor Sharan•Europe Asia Studies•2011

  • Flooding the lake? International democracy promotion and the political economy of the 2014 presidential election in Afghanistan

    J Goodhand, Astri Suhrke et al.•Conflict Security and Development•2016

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,38
Citation span2018 - 2024 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae