Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reconsidering Genocidal Intent in the Interest of Prevention

Bibliographic Data

ID12960956
AuthorsEkkehard Strauß (Griffith University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume5
Issue2
Pages129-153
Publication date2013-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Responsibility to Protect (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1875-984X • E-ISSN: 1875-9858
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/1875984x-00502002
OpenAlexW2091534622
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited2

Early establishment of evidence for genocidal intent would allow responses in the context of R2P, targeted specifically at the prevention of genocide and focus scarce resources and limited political will. This article is an attempt to develop an interpretation of genocidal intent that supports the application of the obligation to prevent genocide in future situations. Past examples, including the situations in Rwanda and Darfur, demonstrated that the interpretation of genocidal intent has important implications for the application of the obligation to prevent genocide under the Convention. While some of the challenges can be traced back to the drafting history of the Convention, a review of the Travaux Preparatoire reveals very limited cross-references between the discussions on intent and considerations of the obligation to prevent genocide. Since the drafting of the Convention there have been significant developments in the interpretation and application of genocidal intent by national and international courts, and in the development of methodology and institutions for early-warning and early action to respond to situations at risk of genocide. International and national courts would have to acknowledge their role in assisting national and international entities in implementing the obligation to prevent and punish genocide by opting for a ‘prevention-friendly’ interpretation and ensuring punishment as early as possible during unfolding events of genocide through the application of genocidal intent. The interpretation of intent must be opened to subsume relevant precursors of genocide into the definitions of article II and III of the Convention. The interpretation of intent has to evolve over time to link well-established risk factors with the acts of genocide spelled out in the Convention

Context (archaeology · Convention · Genocide · Human rights · International law · Interpretation (philosophy · Obligation · Political science · Responsibility to Protect · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · History · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts

  • The Responsibility to Protect

    Open Access•Adrian Gallagher, Blake Lawrinson et al.•Global Responsibility to Protect•2023

  • The Genocide Convention

    F Honig•International Affairs•1961

  • No Lessons Learned from the Holocaust? Assessing Risks of Genocide and Political Mass Murder since 1955

    Barbara Harff•American Political Science Review•2003

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae