Brazilian View Of Responsibility To Protect
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12960962 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida (0000-0002-5899-9254, Fundação Getulio Vargas, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-63 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Responsibility to Protect (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1875-984X • E-ISSN: 1875-9858 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/1875984x-00601003 |
| OpenAlex | W2796835806 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 1 |
Brazil’s foreign policy has traditionally been conducted based on the principle of non-intervention. With the objective of attaining a permanent seat on the Security Council, the country has been demonstrating an effective engagement in peace operations. The principle of non-intervention has given way to that of non-indifference, which represents the first major change in Brazilian diplomacy. A second change stems from Brazil’s proposal of ‘responsibility while protecting’. While this initiative demonstrates the country’s intention to participate actively in the UN, one might ask whether it makes any substantial contribution to the RtoP debate, since several fundamental questions remain unanswered. Is this an attempt to renegotiate and reformulate the concept of RtoP or is it a new a strategy to implement measures based on the RtoP? This article aims to analyse the evolution of the Brazilian view on the RtoP in order to understand its true value
Diplomacy · Economics · Foreign policy · Human rights · Humanitarian intervention · International law · International relations · Intervention (counseling · Law and economics · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Responsibility to Protect · Security council · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Psychology
Following a Middle Way
Negotiating the Responsibility to Protect in the un System
Brazil’s non-indifference
Contemporary humanitarians
Emerging powers and the responsibility to protect
Elected member influence in the United Nations Security Council
What doesn’t kill a norm makes it stronger? Brazil’s contestation of the responsibility to protect
Brazil
Crafting constraints
India and the responsibility to protect
Protection or Interference? The Legitimacy of Contemporary Humanitarian Interventions and the Engagement of Nonhegemonic Powers
Regulating intervention
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2025 (12) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |