Chapter scientists in the IPCC AR5 — experience and lessons learned
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12962303 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lena Schulte‐uebbing (0000-0002-5511-1432, Wageningen University & Research, autor de correspondencia), Gregory Hansen (0000-0003-4435-3484, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research), Ariel Macaspac Hernandez (0000-0002-2727-0882, Fraunhofer Center for International Management and Knowledge Economy), Marten Winter (0000-0002-9593-7300, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research) |
| Año | 2015 |
| Volumen | 14 |
| Páginas | 250-256 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2015-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1877-3435 • E-ISSN: 1877-3443 |
| Editorial | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.012 |
| OpenAlex | W918302442 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 6 |
IPCC Assessment Reports provide timely and accurate information on anthropogenic climate change to policy makers and the public. The reports are written by hundreds of scientists in a voluntary, collaborative effort. Growing amounts of literature and complex procedural and administrative requirements, however, make this effort a substantial management challenge next to a scientific one. During the 5th Assessment Cycle, IPCC Working Groups II and III initiated a program that recruited volunteer scientific assistants who provided technical and logistical support to author teams. In this paper we describe and analyze strengths and weaknesses of this ‘Chapter Scientist program’, based on an extensive survey among Chapter Scientists (CS) and interviews with other stakeholders. We conclude that the program was a useful innovation that that enabled authors to focus more on their core scientific tasks and that contributed to improving the quality of the assessment. We highly recommend similar programs for future scientific assessments. Key criteria for success that we identified are (a) involvement of early-career scientists as CS, (b) close integration of CS in the assessment process, (c) recruitment of CS through an open call to achieve transparency, and (d) provision of funds for such a program to support travel costs and compensation of CS
Best practice · Business · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Knowledge management · Political science · Process (computing · Process management · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · Strengths and weaknesses · Transparency (behavior · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Climate variability and models · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Science · Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations · Psychology
Expert organizations’ institutional understanding of expertise and responsibility for the creation of the next generation of experts
Building urgent intergenerational bridges
Re-imagining the driver–pressure–state–impact–response framework from an equity and inclusive development perspective
Learning about climate change solutions in the IPCC and beyond
Re-imagining the use of integrated assessment models from a social science perspective—lessons from the Sustainable Development Pathways (SDP)
Climate Change and Health Preparedness in Africa
Managing a special report
Early-career scientists in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. A moderate or radical path towards a deliberative future
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,89 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2017 - 2024 (8) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |