Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Diskursiv avpolitisering av demokratiet

Å forstå autoritær konsolidering i Russland gjennom Jacques Rancières tenkning

Bibliographic Data

ID12964463
AuthorsAnni Roth Hjermann (0000-0001-5532-836X, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume80
Issue1
Pages28-52
Publication date2022-02-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternasjonal politikk (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1891-1757 • E-ISSN: 0020-577X
PublisherCappelen Damm Akademisk (PUBLISHER • NO)
DOI10.23865/intpol.v80.3420
OpenAlexW4211125580
LanguageEN
References cited39

Denne artikkelen undersøker diskursens rolle i konsolidering av autoritære regimer. Gjennom å etablere en dialog mellom Jacques Rancières arbeider om politikk og avpolitisering og poststrukturalistisk diskursanalyse argumenterer artikkelen for at diskursiv avpolitisering bidrar til at autokratier befester seg, og viser at autoritær konsolidering ofte finner sted i skjæringsfeltet mellom nasjonal og internasjonal politikk. Artikkelen retter et særskilt søkelys på Rancières begrep om kløfter som politikkens scene, og teoretiserer hvordan slike kløfter nøytraliseres i avpolitisering. Artikkelen fremsetter så en metode for å analysere diskursiv avpolitisering empirisk ved å konseptualisere Rancières logikker som idealtypiske avpolitiseringsdiskurser, og illustrerer denne analytiske strategien ved å anvende den på russisk offisiell diskurs i senere år (2015–2020). Slik forklarer artikkelen hvordan diskursive konstruksjoner har befestet Russland som autokrati: Den viser at autoritær konsolidering i Russland under Putin muliggjøres av rotfestede avpolitiserende diskurser som (re)produseres og forsterkes i et sammenvevet innenriks- og utenrikspolitisk felt. Artikkelen fremmer begrepet diskursiv avpolitisering som et nytt perspektiv på fagdebatter om den liberale verdensordens utfordringer og såkalte hybridregimer. Abstract in English:Depoliticizing Democracy Through Discourse: Understanding Authoritarian Consolidation in Russia through Jacques Rancière’s Political TheoryThis article investigates the role of discourses in processes of authoritarian consolidation. By bringing Jacques Rancière’s works on politics and depoliticization into dialogue with poststructuralist discourse analysis, the article argues that discursive depoliticization contributes towards authoritarian consolidation, and displays how authoritarianism deepens in a co-dependent nexus of domestic and international politics. Focusing in particular on Rancière’s concept of gaps as the stage for politics, the article theorizes how gaps are neutralized in depoliticization. The article offers a method for unpacking discursive depoliticization empirically by conceptualizing Rancière’s logics as ideal-typical depoliticizing discourses, and illustrates this analytical strategy through analysis of Russian official discourse in recent years (2015–2020). The article thereby explains how discursive constructions have strengthened Russian autocracy: Entrenched depoliticizing discourses, produced and reinforced in a co-constitutive internal/external sphere, makes possible authoritarian consolidation in Russia under Putin. The article puts forward the concept of discursive depoliticization as a novel perspective on challenges to the liberal international order, and on “hybrid” regimes

Political science · Sociology · Critical Theory and Political Philosophy · European Union Policy and Governance · Postmodernism in Literature and Education

  • Democracy in translation

    Frederic Charles Schaffer•Democracy in translation•1998

  • Undertaking Discourse Analysis for Social Research

    Kevin Dunn, Kevin C Dunn et al.•Undertaking Discourse Analysis…•2016

  • Disciplining democracy

    Rita Abrahamsen•Disciplining democracy•2000

  • Globalization and Religious Nationalism in India

    Catarina Kinnvall•Globalization and Religious…•2007

  • Competitive Authoritarianism

    Open Access•Steven Levitsky, Lucan A Way•Competitive Authoritarianism…•2001

  • Security as Practice — Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War

    Open Access•Rita Floyd•Journal of International…•2007

  • Democracy as Civilisation”

    Christopher Hobson•Global Society•2007

  • A few remarks on the method of Jacques Rancière

    Jacques Rancière•Parallax•2009

  • Sovereign Democracy, Populism, and Depoliticization in Russia

    Philipp Casula•Problems of Post-Communism•2013

  • Politics, the State, and De-Politicization

    Andrey Makarychev, Andrey S Makarychev•Problems of Post-Communism•2008

  • The Revisionist Moment

    Andrei P Tsygankov•Problems of Post-Communism•2020

  • Questioning Control and Contestation in Late Putinite Russia

    Richard Sakwa•Europe Asia Studies•2015

  • Putin's Power Revisited

    Julie Wilhelmsen•Europe Asia Studies•2019

  • When the Internal and External Collide

    Aglaya Snetkov•Europe Asia Studies•2012

  • The normative threat of subtle subversion

    Maria Mälksoo•Cambridge Review of International…•2019

  • Welcome home! Routines, ontological insecurity and the politics of US military reunion videos

    Brent J Steele•Cambridge Review of International…•2019

  • Case Studies

    Open Access•Jack S Levy•Conflict Management and Peace…•2008

  • Putin, Putinism, and the Domestic Determinants of Russian Foreign Policy

    Michael Mcfaul•International Security•2020

  • The Pussy Riot affair and Putin's démarche from sovereign democracy to sovereign morality

    Open Access•Gulnaz Sharafutdinova•Nationalities Papers•2014

  • How does war become a legitimate undertaking? Re-engaging the post-structuralist foundation of securitization theory

    Open Access•Julie Wilhelmsen•Cooperation and Conflict•2016

  • Anchoring Europe's civilizing identity

    Jennifer Mitzen•Journal of European Public Policy•2006

  • Struggles for Recognition

    Open Access•Rebecca Adler-Nissen, Ayşe Zarakol•International Organization•2021

  • Russia's Europe, 1991-2016

    Open Access•Iver B Neumann•International Affairs•2016

  • Theorizing in sociology and social science

    Open Access•Richard Swedberg•Theory and Society•2011

  • Russia's Postcolonial Identity

    Morozov, V Morozov•Russia's Postcolonial Identity•2015

  • Securitizing “spiritual-moral values” in Russia

    Jardar Østbø•Post-Soviet Affairs•2017

  • The End of the Transition Paradigm

    Open Access•Thomas Carothers•Journal of democracy•2002

  • New Threats to Freedom

    Open Access•Ivan Krastev•Journal of democracy•2006

  • Making Sense of Russia's Illiberalism

    Open Access•Marlène Laruelle•Journal of democracy•2020

  • State–society relations in contemporary Russia

    Open Access•Ammon Cheskin, Luke March•East European Politics•2015

  • Liberal democracy, market economy, and international conduct as standards of ‘civilization’ in contemporary international society

    Open Access•Yannis A Stivachtis•Journal of Eurasian Studies•2015

  • The Study of Discourse in International Relations

    Open Access•Jennifer Milliken•European Journal of International…•1999

  • Ontological Security in World Politics

    Open Access•Jennifer Mitzen•European Journal of International…•2006

  • Methodology of Social Sciences

    Max Weber•Methodology of Social Sciences•2017

  • The Dual State in Russia

    Richard Sakwa•Post-Soviet Affairs•2010

  • Globalization and Religious Nationalism

    Open Access•Catarina Kinnvall•Political Psychology•2004

  • Managing Opposition in a Hybrid Regime

    Open Access•Luke March•Slavic Review•2009

  • The Rise of Illiberal Democracy

    Fareed Zakaria•Foreign Affairs•1997

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae