Finnish Exceptionalism at Play? The Effectiveness of the Recommendations of UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies in Finland
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12965169 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jasper Krommendijk (0000-0002-3371-7580, Maastricht University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 18-43 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nordic Journal of Human Rights (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1891-814X • E-ISSN: 1891-8131 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/18918131.2014.876752 |
| OpenAlex | W2021530162 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 27 |
Finland is generally regarded as a country especially inducive to the impact and effectiveness of international human rights law. This article examines whether this is also the case for the recommendations of UN human rights treaty bodies issued in the context of the process of state reporting. The objective is to elucidate the factors that contribute to the (in)effectiveness of these recommendations by contrasting the Finnish experience with that of the Netherlands and New Zealand. In this way, the article proposes several measures that could serve as an inspiration for Nordic and other countries, in addition to potentially strengthening the impact and effectiveness of the reporting process and the recommendations at the national level
Context (archaeology · Exceptionalism · Geography · Human rights · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Treaty · European and International Law Studies · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Ombudsman and Human Rights
The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices
Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?
Human Rights and Development
The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level
Mobilizing for Human Rights
The Power of Human Rights
From Constitutional Periphery toward the Center – Transformations of Judicial Review in Finland
Why (not) Commit? – Norway, Sweden and Finland and the ILO Convention 169
Quota trouble
The Nordics, the EU and the Reluctance Towards Supranational Judicial Review
From Europeanisation to Diffusion
Compliance and Conflict Management in the European Union
Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism
Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics
| Citations per year | 0.22 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2018 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |