Anti-Effectiveness and Potency in the Residue of Power
Reflecting on an Overlooked International Human Rights Agreement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12965749 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tendayi Bloom (0009-0002-0472-2396, University of Birmingham, corresponding author), Tendayi id_orcid Bloom (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 65-82 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nordic Journal of Human Rights (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1891-814X • E-ISSN: 1891-8131 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/18918131.2026.2622224 |
| OpenAlex | W7131400277 |
| Language | EN |
This article contributes a set of concepts to the study of international human rights agreement-making: anti-effectiveness and potency in the residue of power. It suggests that an agreement is anti-effective insofar as its text cannot be either effective or ineffective. I show that the 1985 United Nations General Assembly Declaration on the Human Rights of Individuals Who are Not Nationals of the Country in Which They Live (DHRN) is anti-effective. Nonetheless, there is power associated with it. Interrogating the story of the DHRN, this article suggests that it can be seen as what will be called a residue of power, and identifies potency within it. This potency is neither centred around nor located in the final text, but is found behind the scenes of the text. I identify three dimensions to this potency, though there may well be more: potency-in-power-politics, potency-in-ideas, and potency-in-momentum
Declaration · General assembly · Human rights · Potency · Power (physics · Residue (chemistry · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Human Rights and Development · International Law and Human Rights
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |