Social Stratification in Japanese and Some Other Martial Arts

A Comparison and Discussion of Changes

Bibliographic Data

ID12966284
AuthorsW J Cynarski (0000-0003-1252-5456, Rzeszów University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume59
Issue1
Pages49-59
Publication date2013-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhysical Culture and Sport Studies and Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1899-4849 • E-ISSN: 2081-2221
PublisherDe Gruyter Open (PUBLISHER • PL)
DOI10.2478/pcssr-2013-0024
OpenAlexW2027951197
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited7

Using the humanistic theory of martial arts and martial arts sociology, the author attempts to describe and explain the relationship between social stratification and martial arts. He asks whether a person’s position in the martial arts environment is, today, dependent on social background. He asks: Who could practice with weapons, and which weapons, a hundred years ago? Who can study in the ancient fencing schools today? The analysis includes martial arts in ancient Japan, Europe and Brazil as well as today. He finds that positions originally went to those in the privileged classes or social strata. Today, this does not matter. It can be concluded that there is simply a generational transmission of interest within families. Position in the martial arts, as in many other areas, is part of a person’s long-term effort to determine their own position in society, or “position developed independently”. Martial arts are part of the farreaching democratization and leveling of society. Positions inherited from father to son arise only very rarely. This mainly now happens only in the ancient ancestral schools

Art · Humanism · Martial arts · Political science · Social science · Social stratification · Sociology · The arts · Visual arts · History · Law · Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Sports, Gender, and Society

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access