Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Ordinary and Extraordinary

Producing Migrant Inclusion and Exclusion in US Sanctuary Movements

Bibliographic Data

ID12967669
AuthorsSerin D Houston (Mount Holyoke College), Charlotte C Morse (Mount Holyoke College), Charlotte Morse
Year2017
Volume11
Issue1
Pages27-47
Publication date2017-02-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in Social Justice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1911-4788 • E-ISSN: 1911-4788
PublisherBrock University Library (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.26522/ssj.v11i1.1081
OpenAlexW2593736735
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited12

This article analyzes the Sanctuary Movement for Central Americans and the New Sanctuary Movement, two United States faith-based social movements, to think through the ways in which these pro-immigrant efforts paradoxically render migrants figuratively mute and often excluded from conceptualizations of the nation and its inhabitants even as they advocate for legal inclusion. We examine this tension of inclusion and exclusion through the frequent representation of migrants’ histories and Christianity as extraordinary in the Sanctuary Movement for Central Americans, and migrants’ lives as ordinary in the New Sanctuary Movement. We identify two key processes by which this framing of migrants as extraordinary or ordinary limits the enactment of full social, political, and economic inclusion: (a) public support is principally granted to certain stories, religions, identities, and experiences; and (b) migrants are consistently positioned, and often celebrated, by sanctuary activists as “others.” The discourses of migrants as extraordinary or ordinary effectively generate broad involvement of faith communities in sanctuary work. Yet, as we argue, this framing comes with the cost of limiting activist support only to particular groups of migrants, flattening the performances of migrant identities, and positioning migrants as perpetually exterior to the US. Reliance on discourses of the extraordinary and ordinary, therefore, can truncate opportunities for making legible a range of migration experiences and extending belonging to all migrants, outcomes that arise in contrast to the purported inclusionary goals of the faith-based sanctuary social movements

Epistemology · Faith · Framing (construction · Immigration · Inclusion (mineral · Inclusion–exclusion principle · Limiting · Political science · Politics · Social movement · Sociology · Gender Studies · History · Law · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Religious Tourism and Spaces

  • A Better Future

    Open Access•Wenona Mary Giles, Jacqueline Bhabha et al.•Better Future•2020

  • Autotopographies of Forced Displacement

    Open Access•Michal Hu•Journal of Refugee Studies•2022

  • Welcoming the stranger in Trump’s America

    Open Access•Austin Kocher•Hospitality & Society•2022

  • Efectos jurídicos de la resistencia social a la legislación de asilo y refugio

    Open Access•Leandro Martínez Peñas•Araucaria•2021

  • She can’t even see her shadow”

    Vojislava Filipcevic Cordes•Journal of Urban Affairs•2021

  • Migrant solidarities and the politics of place

    Open Access•Harald Bauder•Progress in Human Geography•2019

  • Geographies of migration II

    Open Access•Patricia Ehrkamp•Progress in Human Geography•2017

  • Seeing Sanctuary

    Open Access•David Manuel Hernández•Genealogy•2020

  • The Interlocking Processes Constraining the Struggle for Sanctuary in the Trump Era

    Open Access•Gilda L Ochoa•Social Sciences•2021

  • Of Course We Need to Help the Undocumented Immigrants

    Open Access•Josefina Flores Morales, Fanni Farago•Sociological Perspectives•2021

  • Urban Solidarity

    Open Access•H Bauder•Critical Sociology•2021

  • Expanding Sanctuary

    Open Access•Oska Paul•Critical Sociology•2023

  • Conceptualizing Sanctuary as a Process in the United States ⋆

    Open Access•Serin Houston, Serin D Houston•Geographical Review•2019

  • Sanctuary city as mobilising metaphor

    R Humphris•New Community•2023

  • The voice of the voiceless

    Caroline Patsias, Nastassia Williams•Sanctuary Practices in…•2012

  • Sanctuary Revisited

    Lane Van Ham•Political Theology•2009

  • Promised Land? Immigration, Religiosity, and Space in Southern California

    Open Access•Clara Irazabal Zurita, Grace R Dyrness•Space and Culture•2010

  • Understanding 'Sanctuary

    Philip Marfleet•Journal of Refugee Studies•2011

  • Falling Outside

    Open Access•B Coutin, Susan Bibler Coutin•Law & Social Inquiry•2011

  • Compassion and Rage

    Jane Juffer•South Atlantic Quarterly•2009

  • This Ground is Holy

    Charles B Keely, Ignatius Bau•Population and Development Review•1986

  • The Sanctuary Movement and Central American Activism in Los Angeles

    Open Access•Norma Stoltz Chinchilla, Nora Hamilton et al.•Latin American Perspectives•2009

  • Women in the Sanctuary Movement

    Christy M Ponticelli, Robin Lorentzen•Sociological Analysis•1992

Unique citing works14
Citations per year1,56
Citation span2017 - 2023 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae