The New Vocabulary of Resilience and the Governance of University Student Life

Bibliographic Data

ID12967705
AuthorsKatie Aubrecht (0000-0002-8948-275X, Mount Saint Vincent University, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume6
Issue1
Pages67-83
Publication date2012-10-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in Social Justice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1911-4788 • E-ISSN: 1911-4788
PublisherBrock University Library (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.26522/ssj.v6i1.1069
OpenAlexW2146002330
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited21

This article examines the governance of student life in university settings through an examination of discourses of wellness and resilience in the university sector, and in particular at the University of Toronto. Resilience, it is argued, is strategically deployed in ways that enjoin students to think positively about their experiences of university life so as to avert any experience of distress or disability. This is undertaken with the aim of producing a healthy and ‘well’ student body, but does little to address inequalities amongst students, nor how such inequalities might be important in addressing student distress. Focusing on an analysis of the University of Toronto Student Life Programs and Services programs and publications, and in particular pamphlets and newsletters, such as Health & Wellness: Helping Students Make the Most of the University Experience (2009), it seeks to understand the role of resilience in the production of student life and the governance of the university experience. The purpose of this analysis is to examine the possibilities and limits of a new vocabulary of resilience (Seligman, 2009), which posits an expectation of suffering as a resource which can be drawn on in times of stress, and the “positive” disciplinary regimes this vocabulary enforces. This examination is carried out with the overall aim of disrupting unexamined relations to representations of institutional sites and services as resources, and to demonstrate how such representations rely on and reproduce notions of difference, disability and distress as difficulties to be both renounced and exploited. It is also to provoke greater recognition within social justice studies of how university health services texts such as the Health & Wellness pamphlet and newsletters directed at students strategically deploy notions of resilience to govern interpretations of resistance as illness, rather than emancipatory action

Corporate governance · Discipline · Distress · Economics · Inequality · Library science · Life course approach · Linguistics · Management · Political science · Psychological resilience · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Student life · Vocabulary · Clinical Psychology · Disability Rights and Representation · Occupational Therapy Practice and Research · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access