Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ethical and Legal Issues of Interaction between a Defence Lawyer and a Prosecutor during the Criminal Trial

Bibliographic Data

ID12970485
AuthorsSergiy O Ivanytskyy (0000-0002-3085-1602, National Academy of Internal Affairs, corresponding author), В С Бондар (0000-0003-1552-4555, Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O.Didorenko), Alina P Bunina (0000-0001-5621-345X, Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O.Didorenko), Demyd A Morozov (Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O.Didorenko), Dmytro Y Fursov (Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O.Didorenko)
Year2020
Volume9
Pages1474-1480
Publication date2020-12-09
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Criminology and Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1929-4409 • E-ISSN: 1929-4409
PublisherLifescience Global (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.167
OpenAlexW3112977015
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited8

The institutions of the prosecution and defence are recognised as equitable related institutions that facilitate the activities of the judiciary. The consolidation of the new status of the institution of defence in the judicial system necessitates the study of new forms of communication between the defence and the court, the principles of such interaction, including the consideration of international standards and European experience. The novelty of the study is determined by the fact that interaction between a defence lawyer and a prosecutor can only be within the framework of a court session and any exchange of information can be performed only if full publicity is achieved in the process of interaction between a defence lawyer and a prosecutor. The authors show that interaction is carried out through a judge and is completely personalised. Accordingly, the interaction should be implemented to influence the judge in the process of forming and passing an appropriate judgement. The authors determine that the such a judgement can be formed in the course of communication and the provision of certain arguments that a defence lawyer cannot communicate in advance and which can only be voiced during a court session. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of innovating the activities of a defence lawyer and increasing the appropriate level of perception on the part of the judge and, accordingly, the prosecutor as representatives of the institutions of justice

Business · Consolidation (business · Economic Justice · Institution · Judgement · Novelty · Political science · Publicity · Session (web analytics · Law · Legal Studies and Reforms · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues · Psychology · Social Psychology · Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies

  • Criminal Judicial Actions of the Defence Lawyer and Prosecutor

    Sergiy O Ivanytskyy, Volodymyr S Bondar et al.•Public Integrity•2024

  • Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

    Open Access•Alexander Shytov, Peter Duff•The International Journal of…•2019

  • Recursivity in Legal Change

    Open Access•Sida Liu, Terence C Halliday•Law & Social Inquiry•2009

  • How do international lawyers handle facts? The role of folk sociological theories at the International Criminal Court

    Open Access•Julien Seroussi•British Journal of Sociology•2018

  • Revolution in Latin American Criminal Procedure

    Melanie Langer•The American Journal of…•2007

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae