Deliberative E-Rulemaking Project
Challenges to Enacting Real World Deliberation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12972185 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jennifer Stromer-Galley, Jennifer Stromer‐galley (0000-0001-6079-8788, University at Albany, State University of New York, corresponding author), Nick Webb (University at Albany, State University of New York), Peter Muhlberger (Texas Tech University) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 82-96 |
| Publication date | 2012-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Information Technology & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1933-169X • E-ISSN: 1933-1681 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/19331681.2012.635971 |
| OpenAlex | W2008339701 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 33 |
This article describes the challenges facing a federal government–funded initiative to promote online deliberation to improve the public comment process by federal and state government agencies in the United States. The three year project met several difficulties. Some have been technical, but our primary obstacle has been in securing partnerships with government agencies. Due to institutional, legal, and organizational challenges, many government agencies are resistant to opening up the public comment process to a deliberative structure, although some change occurred following the Obama administration's Open Government Initiative. This article describes the objectives of the original research project and details the challenges faced with the hope of guiding future deliberation research projects that aim to work with federal agencies in the U.S
Administration (probate law · Deliberation · Government (linguistics · Obstacle · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Public relations · Rulemaking · State (computer science · Work (physics · Computer Science · E-Government and Public Services · Engineering · Law · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Media and Politics
Model Solutions and Pragmatism in Developing ICT for Public Consultations
Promoting online deliberation quality
Enhancing Deliberation with Digital Democratic Innovations
Nurturing Virtues with Digital Democratic Innovations
Evaluation of public consultations and citizens’ participation in 2015 Better Regulation Agenda of the EU and the need for a deliberative e-rulemaking initiative in the EU
Artificial facilitation
Public policy and obstacles to the virtual agora
Usages of an E-participation platform by legislators
Reason against the machine? Future directions for mass online deliberation
The prospects of E-democracy
Emancipation cannot be programmed
La participation citoyenne en ligne au Québec
Ideology and discontent
What Americans know about politics and why it matters
WordNet
Digital Era Governance
The Case Against Mass E‐mails
E-Rulemaking
The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics
The spiral of silence
Reasonable Democracy
Avoiding Politics
Mail and Internet Surveys
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond
Participation in E-Rulemaking
Sweet-Talking the Fourth Branch
The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion
Perceived Support for One's Opinions and Willingness to Speak Out
Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion
Deliberative Rationalality and Models of Democratic Legitimacy
Measuring Political Sophistication
Disaggregating Deliberation’s Effects
Considered Opinions
The impact of information on small group choice
Public policy and obstacles to the virtual agora
Does Deliberative Democracy Work
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors
How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions
WordNet
From Group Member to Democratic Citizen
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |