Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Indigenous Antinuclear Literary Resistance

Jim Northrup’s Satire and Anishinaabe Trans/nationalism

Bibliographic Data

ID12976643
AuthorsKyoko Matsunaga (Institute of World Literature of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume11
Issue2
Publication date2020-12-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Transnational American Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1940-0764 • E-ISSN: 1940-0764
PublisherCalifornia Digital Library (CDL) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5070/t8112049585
OpenAlexW3121742180
LanguageEN
References cited9

“Indigenous Antinuclear Literary Resistance: Jim Northrup’s Satire and Anishinaabe Trans/nationalism” examines the way Jim Northrup (1943–2016), an Anishinaabe writer from the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa in northern Minnesota, engages Anishinaabe trans/nationalism as he combats nuclear colonialism in his satirical columns. The fundamental nature of Anishinaabe trans/nationalism, described by Joseph Bauerkemper and Heidi Kiiwetinepinesiik Stark in “Trans/National Terrain of Anishinaabe Law and Diplomacy,” forms the basis of Northrup’s resistance to nuclear colonialism as he critiques the nuclear power plant and radioactive waste threatening the Mdewakanton Dakota residents of the Prairie Island Indian Community. He adds another layer to the politics of Indigenous trans/nationalism when he ridicules plans to send the radioactive waste from Prairie Island to be stored on the land of other Indigenous nations such as the Western Shoshone and Mescalero Apache. On another level, by emphasizing the bonds between Anishinaabe people in the United States and Canada, Northrup implies that Anishinaabe nationhood precedes the borders of nation states, defying the ideology of “transnational” in a conventional sense. With Indigenous trans/nationalism at the center of its argument, this essay considers Northrup’s use of satire and humor as an atomic age strategy to manifest Anishinaabe nationhood as well as to establish transnational Indigenous alliances to combat nuclear colonialism. Northrup situates his antinuclear opposition as part of an enduring multilateral Indigenous resistance to settler colonialism, and, in so doing, he emphasizes the importance of exercising treaty rights and insisting on the inherent sovereignty of the Anishinaabe people

Biology · Colonialism · Indigenous · Nationalism · Political science · Politics · Resistance (ecology · Sovereignty · American Literature and Humor Studies · Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature · History · Law · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Ecology

  • The tainted desert

    Valerie Kuletz•The tainted desert•1998

  • The Trans/National Terrain of Anishinaabe Law and Diplomacy

    Open Access•Joseph Bauerkemper, Heidi Kiiwetinepinesiik Stark•Journal of Transnational American…•2012

  • The Rhetoric of Nuclear Colonialism

    Danielle Endres•Communication and Critical/Cultural…•2009

  • Monitored Retrievable Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Indian Country

    John D Erickson, Jon D Erickson et al.•American Indian Law Review•1994

  • Red on Red

    Open Access•Craig Womack, Craig S Womack•Red on Red•1999

  • Native American Scholarship and the Transnational Turn

    Open Access•Robert Warrior•Cultural Studies Review•1970

  • Marked by Fire

    Heidi Kiiwetinepinesiik Stark, Heidi Kiiwetinepinesiik Stark Heidi…•The American Indian Quarterly•2012

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae