Do Not Blame the Media! The Role of Politicians and Parties in Fragmenting Online Political Debate
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12977600 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Raphael H Heiberger (0000-0003-3465-7214, University of Stuttgart), Silvia Majó-Vázquez (0000-0002-2312-7907, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Laia Castro (0000-0001-6281-0365, University of Zurich), R K Nielsen (0000-0002-3376-4918, University of Oxford), Frank Esser (0000-0002-1627-1521, University of Zurich) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 910-941 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The International Journal of Press/Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1940-1612 • E-ISSN: 1040-1620 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/19401612211015122 |
| OpenAlex | W3164003127 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 58 |
Democratic politics builds on both clear differences and shared common ground. While the rise of digital media may have enabled more differences to be articulated, common ground is often seen as threatened by fragmentation of political debate, which some see as driven by news media. The relative importance of political actors (parties and politicians) in driving fragmentation has received less attention. In this paper, we compare how news media and political actors contribute to the fragmentation of online political debate on the basis of analysis of almost half a million election-related tweets collected during the 2017 French, German, and U.K. national elections. We employ a structural topic model to reduce online political debate to networks of topic overlap. Across the three countries with different political and media systems, we find news media are by far the most important actors in terms of creating and maintaining a common space of online political debate on Twitter. Our results also show that political actors, with some variation from country to country, contribute more to fragmentation as they focus on different topics while articulating clear differences. These findings underline the importance of complementing structural analysis of the rise of digital and social media with analysis of how important elite actors like news media and political parties/candidates use these media in different ways. Overall, we show how at least on Twitter, across three different countries with different media systems and political systems, news media create connection that contributes to commonality while political actors lay out clear differences that drive fragmentation
Blame · Democracy · Digital media · Elite · Media studies · News media · Political communication · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Law · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Folk theories of fake news
May Understand, but Cannot Relate
Broadcast information diffusion processes on social media networks
Broadcast Information Diffusion Processes on Social Media Networks
My Voters Should See This! What News Items Are Shared by Politicians on Facebook
Interactive Election Campaigns on Social Media? Flow of Political Information Among Journalists and Politicians as an Element of the Communication Strategy of Political Actors
Discontentment trumps Euphoria
Calling into the void? German forest dieback 2.0 debate on Twitter. A case study to operationalize the analysis of discursive power in hybrid media systems
Asymmetric Polarization in Online Media Engagement in the United States Congress
Using Social Media to Respond to Negative Polls
Applying Machine Learning in Sociology
Media and Policy Making in the Digital Age
What Americans know about politics and why it matters
Networks
How Political Actors Use the Media
Comparing Media Systems
The Hybrid Media System
Identifying sets of key players in a social network
Lexical shifts, substantive changes, and continuity in State of the Union discourse, 1790–2014
Machine learning
A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences
Ideological Segregation Online and Offline
Topics in semantic representation.
Finding and evaluating community structure in networks
Tweeting From Left to Right
Community structure in social and biological networks
De la liberté
Media Roles in the Online News Domain
The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation
Are News Audiences Increasingly Fragmented? A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform News Audience Fragmentation and Duplication
Political Public Relations and Mediatization
Preaching to the choir
Discursive Power in Contemporary Media Systems
Political Agenda Setting in the Hybrid Media System
Twitter use in election campaigns
Explaining the Emergence of Political Fragmentation on Social Media
The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign
Is Facebook Eroding the Public Agenda? Evidence From Survey and Web-Tracking Data
Parties, Ideology, and News Media in Central-Eastern and Western Europe
Converging on a nativist core? Comparing issues on the Facebook pages of the Pegida movement and the Alternative for Germany
The power and politics of blogs
Why Social Media May Have Won the 2017 General Election
Paradigm Wars Revisited
Agenda Setting through Social Media
User-generated visibility
And Deliver Us from Segmentation
A Look at Agenda-setting
Comparing Disaster News on Twitter and Television
The End of Mass Communication
Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses
Capacity, Diversity, and Volatility of the Public Agenda
Communication and Public Opinion
The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media
Computational Identification of Media Frames
The Backbone Structure of Audience Networks
Bridging Gaps in Cross-Cutting Media Exposure
Text as Data
Consociational Democracy
Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data
Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |