The role of psychologists in multi-disciplinary teams for intersex/diverse sex development
Interviews with British and Swedish clinical specialists
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12978488 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lih-Mei Liao, Lih‐mei Liao (University College London, autor de correspondencia), K Roen (0000-0003-0421-2484, University of Waikato) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 12 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 202-216 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-11-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Psychology and Sexuality (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1941-9902 • E-ISSN: 1941-9899 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/19419899.2019.1689158 |
| OpenAlex | W2987050881 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 8 |
| Referencias citadas | 44 |
This is an interview study with 32 British and Swedish health professionals who worked in multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) that delivered care for children and adults with intersex variations, otherwise referenced in biomedicine as disorders of sex development (DSD). The present qualitative analysis focuses, first, on the health professionals’ talk about their team and, second, on their talk about contributions of the psychologist in the team. Although all of the interviewees referred to their team as a MDT, their talk reflected an overwhelmingly unidisciplinary, medicalised knowing and talking of intersex variations. This understanding prefigures service priorities and dictates clinical processes. Psychologists were said to be important, but their contributions were typically considered more relevant after medical interventions and, however valuable, were understood as optional. Above all, psychological contributions were conceptualised in such a way as to preclude strategic applications of psychological theories and research to re-think variations of physical sex development and the care process. The present analysis suggests a need to substantially re-work relationships between team members and reflect on the overall care ethos in order to engage patients and families psychologically. Until then, DSD specialists may be more accurately described as working in a multi-professional service than providing integrated MDT care
Discipline · Ethos · Health care · Medical education · Multidisciplinary approach · Multidisciplinary team · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Qualitative research · Service (business · Sociology · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Introduction to the Special Issue
Towards a whole-school approach for sexuality education in supporting and upholding the rights and health of students with intersex variations
Intersex lived experience
Gendered Childhoods, Linear Sex Development and Unruly Temporalities
Intersex in the USA’s Best-Selling Undergraduate Psychology Textbooks
Social work with people with variations in sex characteristics
Towards an agency-based model of intersex, variations of sex characteristics (VSC) and DSD/dsd health
Psychosocial approaches and discursive gaps in intersex healthcare
Contesting Intersex
Global Disorders of Sex Development Update since 2006
Consensus Statement on Management of Intersex Disorders
Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling
Hormones, context, and “Brain Gender”
Intersex or Diverse Sex Development
Making sense of ‘Intersex’ and ‘DSD’
Intersex/DSD post-Chicago
A values-driven and evidence-based health care psychology for diverse sex development
Making it safe
Shifting syndromes
The Impact of Institutional Forces Upon Knowledge Sharing in the UK NHS
Qualitative Research in Clinical and Health Psychology
Hermaphrodites and the medical invention of sex
But We Have to Do Something
The Medical Construction of Gender
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,6 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 8 |