Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Engels on women, the family, class and gender

Bibliographic Data

ID12979306
AuthorsSheila Margaret McGregor (corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume14
Issue2
Pages186-197
Publication date2021-03-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Geography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1942-7786 • E-ISSN: 2633-674X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/19427786211000047
OpenAlexW3138606252
LanguageEN
References cited21

This article looks at Engels’s writings to show that his ideas about the role of labour in the evolution of human beings in a dialectical relationship between human beings and nature is a crucial starting point for understanding human society and is correct in its essentials. It is important for understanding that we developed as a species on the basis of social cooperation. The way human beings produce and reproduce themselves, the method of historical materialism, provides the basis for understanding how class and women’s oppression arose and how that can explain LGBTQ oppression. Although Engels’s analysis was once widely accepted by the socialist movement, it has mainly been ignored or opposed by academic researchers and others, including geographers, and more recently by Marxist feminists. However, anthropological research from the 1960s and 1970s as well as more recent anthropological and archaeological research provide overwhelming evidence for the validity of Engels’s argument that there were egalitarian, pre-class societies without women’s oppression. However, much remains to be explained about the transition to class societies. Engels’s analysis of the impact of industrial capitalism on gender roles shows how society shapes our behaviour. Engels’s method needs to be constantly reasserted against those who would argue that we are a competitive, aggressive species who require rules to suppress our true nature, and that social development is driven by ideas, not by changes in the way we produce and reproduce ourselves

Argument (complex analysis · Biology · Capitalism · Class (philosophy · Class analysis · Dialectic · Epistemology · Historical materialism · Marxist philosophy · Materialism · Oppression · Political science · Politics · Social class · Social science · Sociology · Gender Studies · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Law · Philosophy

  • Sisters and wives

    Karen Sacks•Sisters and wives•1982

  • Marx’s Philosophy of Revolution in Permanence for Our Day

    Raya Dunayevskaya, Franklin Dmitryev•Marx’s Philosophy of Revolution…•2019

  • Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution

    Open Access•Dietrich Stout, Thierry Chaminade•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2012

  • How Not to Skip Class

    Tithi Bhattacharya•Social Reproduction Theory•2017

  • Wayward servants

    Colin M Turnbull•Wayward servants•1976

  • Female Power and Male Dominance

    Peggy Reeves Sanday•Female Power and Male Dominance•2021

  • The Dictionary of human geography

    D R Stoddart, David M Smith et al.•The Dictionary of human geography•1986

  • The Class Nature of Women's Oppression

    Open Access•Paddy Quick•Review of Radical Political…•1977

  • Rosa Luxemburg, Women’s Liberation and Marx’s Philosophy of Revolution

    Bat-Ami Bar On, Bat‐Ami Bar On et al.•Idealistic Studies•1985

  • Marx on Gender and the Family

    Heather Brown, Heather A Brown•Marx on gender and the family•2012

  • Marxism and the Oppression of Women

    Lise Vogel•Marxism and the Oppression of Women•2013

  • Food and social complexity at Çayönü Tepesi, southeastern Anatolia

    Open Access•Jessica Pearson, M La Grove et al.•Journal of Anthropological…•2013

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Carmen Teeple Hopkins•Women s Studies International Forum•2014

  • Göbekli Tepe, Southeastern Turkey. A Preliminary Report on the 1995-1999 Excavations

    Katja Schmidt•Paléorient•2000

  • Social reproduction and capitalist production

    Open Access•Jamie Winders, Barbara Ellen Smith et al.•Progress in Human Geography•2018

  • The Socio-Cultural Context of Rape

    Open Access•Peggy Reeves Sanday•Journal of Social Issues•1981

  • The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism

    Open Access•Heidi I Hartmann, Heidi Hartmann•Capital & Class•1979

  • Hunter-Gatherers and Human Evolution

    Richard B Lee•Annual Review of Anthropology•2018

  • So Fair a House

    Edward B Banning•Current Anthropology•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae