The Nuclear Power Renaissance in the Uk
Democratic Deficiencies within the ‘Consensus’ on Sustainability
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12979355 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Philip Johnstone (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 91-104 |
| Publication date | 2010-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1942-7786 • E-ISSN: 2633-674X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/194277861000300207 |
| OpenAlex | W1936049115 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 12 |
This paper focuses on New Labour's policy towards the nuclear renaissance. It places this policy in the context of wider discussions on the democratic implications of the new constellations of governance emerging from the drive towards more sustainable futures. The paper identifies two crucial developments within the nuclear renaissance: firstly, the controversy surrounding the consultative process in 2006 and 2007; and secondly, the creation of new ‘efficient’ and ‘streamlined’ planning procedures through the establishment of the Planning Act 2008 and The Infrastructure and Planning Commission (IPC). The article builds on work which seeks to bring together questions of ‘democracy’ and ‘the political’ within discussions on ‘sustainability’. It argues that an understanding of these moments can only be properly established through an analysis of the wider discursive frame of ‘sustainability’ in which nuclear has been reinvented, and the way it has been utilized as a strategic tool of governing. The apparent ‘consensus’ on sustainability appears to foreclose discussions on multiple and divergent political imaginaries into a single shared vision. This is symptomatic of the wider conditions of the post-political and the post-democratic, where debate is reduced to managerial and technocratic particularities in which, regardless of public engagement, nuclear power becomes an ‘inevitability’
Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Democracy · Economics · Management · Nuclear power · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Sustainability · Technocracy · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Law · Public Administration · Risk Perception and Management · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Rebirth, Devastation and Sickness
The question of ‘sustainable’ technology
New nuclear, new security? Framing security in the policy case for new nuclear power in the United Kingdom
Contending narratives on the sustainability of nuclear energy in Turkey
Relational territoriality and the spatial embeddedness of nuclear energy
Towards pragmatic narratives of societal engagement in the UK energy system
Comparing nuclear trajectories in Germany and the United Kingdom
(Non-) Alternative energy transitions
Placing the intangible
Nuclear Power Policy in the UK since 2010
Anti-Nuclear Movement in India
From post‐political to authoritarian planning in England, a crisis of legitimacy
Scale and colonialism in nuclear waste siting
Towards a geography of tolerance
The age of the manager is over? Shale gas fracking and the challenge to the post-political regime for English planning
Environmental Justice as Scalar Parity
Environmental Values
Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate
Impossible Sustainability and the Post-political Condition
For a Sociological Marxism
Climate change or nuclear power—No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain
Nuclear Futures
The New Governance
The Antinomies of the Postpolitical City
Eco-politics beyond the paradigm of sustainability
Introducing disagreement
Against the Populist Temptation
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,14 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2025 (14) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |