The Strategy of Drone Warfare
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12980906 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Fowler (0000-0003-1164-5456, United States Air Force Academy, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 108-119 |
| Publication date | 2014-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Strategic Security (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1944-0464 • E-ISSN: 1944-0472 |
| Publisher | University of South Florida Libraries (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5038/1944-0472.7.4.8 |
| OpenAlex | W2090114552 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
There is a budding controversy with the combat use of Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA). Also known as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), there is a growing literature critiquing the use of RPAs, often using the pejorative term “drone.” RPAs seem to get the blame for a variety of complaints about policy and employment that have little to do with the airframe or its processes. While all of the military functions of an RPA can and are done by manned aircraft, the RPAs must endure additional scrutiny. The decision to employ RPAs requires additional considerations at both the strategic and operational levels of war. This article explores the strategic issues that govern the decisions to employ RPAs in combat. The decision to employ RPAs involves a variety of strategic and operational concerns involving legal issues, technological constraints, operational efficiency, and an interdependency upon information operations
Aeronautics · Airframe · Business · Computer security · Drone · Political science · Risk analysis (engineering · Scrutiny · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Engineering · Law · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence · Aerospace Engineering
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |