Strategic Relationships, Risk, and Proxy War
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12981075 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amos C Fox (0000-0001-8455-3742, United States Army, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 1-24 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Strategic Security (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1944-0464 • E-ISSN: 1944-0472 |
| Publisher | University of South Florida Libraries (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5038/1944-0472.14.2.1879 |
| OpenAlex | W3172981923 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 4 |
Proxy wars dominate modern war fighting. Despite the frequency of proxy wars on today's battle field, the strategic studies community lacks sufficient models and strategic theories to frame proxy wars from the strategic level. This works seeks to build on the limited amount of preexisting theoretical work on proxy war by introducing five models of proxy relation - coerced, transactional, cultural, exploitative, and contractual. This models help policymakers, strategists, and practitioners understand and navigate through the strategic workings of today's proxy wars
Battle · Business · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Proxy (statistics · Public relations · Transactional leadership · Computer Science · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · History · Military and Defense Studies · Military History and Strategy
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |