On two types of governance theory. A response to B. Guy Peters
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12985181 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark Bevir (0000-0001-9666-3113, University of California, Berkeley, corresponding author), Benjamin Krupicka (University of California, Berkeley) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 450-453 |
| Publication date | 2011-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critical Policy Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1946-0171 • E-ISSN: 1946-018X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/19460171.2011.628069 |
| OpenAlex | W2065033630 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 4 |
In ‘Governance as political theory’ B. Guy Peters argues that the use of governance as a theoretical concept can bring focus to political science by highlighting the ‘steering’ and ‘rowing’ roles t
Corporate governance · Economics · Epistemology · Focus (optics · Geography · Law and economics · Management · Political science · Politics · Rowing · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,43 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |