Reforming Mineral Ownership and Ensuring Surface Owners' Rights
The Gosselies Disaster
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12988877 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kevin Troch (Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development of Guizhou Province, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 319-345 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Environment (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1973-3739 • E-ISSN: 2053-7352 |
| Publisher | Liverpool University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3197/ge.2018.110206 |
| OpenAlex | W2891149713 |
| Language | EN |
In interwar Belgium, coal mining suffered a double, socioeconomic and environmental, crisis. The rise in coal production went along with increased mining damage. The cost of the damage became so high that mining companies were unable to bear it. In 1934, a disaster in the town of Gosselies revealed the weakness of the Belgian mining industry. The town was disfigured by the effects of surface subsidence caused by the Grand Conty and Spinois mining company. Unable to make compensation to victimised surface owners, the company declared itself bankrupt. The Belgian state was then faced with an unprecedented environmental crisis threatening to jeopardise the future of coal extraction in the country. The disaster was an opportunity to reconsider the mineral ownership regime and ensure better compensation for surface owners by placing the regulation of mining damage under administrative oversight
Business · Coal · Coal mining · Compensation (psychology · Economics · Natural resource economics · State (computer science · Waste management · Engineering · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental law and policy · Mining and Resource Management
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |