Potentiality and Actuality in Peirce and Dewey
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13002185 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jim Garrison (Virginia Wesleyan University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2036-4091 • E-ISSN: 2036-4091 |
| Publisher | Associazione Pragma (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.4000/12yvv |
| OpenAlex | W4405600326 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
This paper fills a gap in the literature concerning the importance of the categories of potentiality and actuality in the philosophies of Charles Sanders Peirce and John Dewey. Peirce and Dewey derived their positions by revising Aristotle. Their revisions are surprisingly similar in many aspects and different in at least one significant feature – haecceity. Peirce and Dewey’s pragmatic reconstruction of actuality and potentiality is perhaps the most important advance since the Scholastics. The goal is to recover the categories of potentiality and actuality for the future development of pragmatism
Epistemology · Pragmatism · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
| Highly cited | No |
|---|