Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How reasonable is intactivism

A reply to Van Howe

Bibliographic Data

ID13006571
AuthorsMartyn Griffin (0000-0002-8574-7917, Durham University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume3
Issue2
Pages234-236
Publication date2013-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Discourse (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2043-7897 • E-ISSN: 2326-9995
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/23269995.2013.805521
OpenAlexW2019614244
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited1

This is a reply to:Van Howe, R. 2013. “Infant male circumcision in the public square: applying the public reason of John Rawls.” Global Discourse. 3 (2): 214–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2013.805515

Epistemology · Law and economics · Sociology · Theology · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Genital Health and Disease · Philosophy · Torture, Ethics, and Law

  • Circumcision, public health, genital autonomy and cultural rights

    Matthew Thomas Johnson, Megan O’Branski•Global Discourse•2013

  • Infant male circumcision in the public square

    Robert S Van Howe•Global Discourse•2013

Citations per year0.08
Citation span2013 - 2013 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae