Ash and Garcia on bump stocks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13007632 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Graham Harman (0000-0003-2566-309X, Southern California Institute of Architecture, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 374-377 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-06 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogues in Human Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2043-8206 • E-ISSN: 2043-8214 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2043820620940056 |
| OpenAlex | W3038443312 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 8 |
This commentary is a response to James Ash’s ‘Flat Ontology and Geography’, one of the first serious efforts to make use of the philosophy of Tristan Garcia for social science purposes. After reviewing some key distinctions between different kinds of flat ontology, I suggest that both Ash and Garcia make a step forward while failing to strike the desired balance between interconnected networks and autonomous units
Computer security · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Garcia · Humanities · Key (lock · Ontology · Sociology · Computer Science · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |