A matter of perspective
Global governance and the distinction between public and private authority (and not law)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13008977 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthias Goldmann (0000-0002-6551-1624, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 48-84 |
| Publication date | 2016-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Constitutionalism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2045-3817 • E-ISSN: 2045-3825 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s2045381715000209 |
| OpenAlex | W3121943523 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 63 |
This article argues that a distinction between the public and the private is both desirable and feasible in times of global governance, at least as a regulative idea. The confusion surrounding this distinction originates in different understandings of the relationship between state and society in liberalism and republicanism. Discourse theory with its idea of the co-origin of democracy and human rights reconceptualises the relationship between state and society in a way that does justice to both liberal and republican approaches. Accordingly, the public/private distinction is crucial for the realisation of democracy and freedom. Classifying an act as public or private determines what kind of legitimacy it requires. The article then recalibrates discourse theory to face the challenges of global governance, shifting its focus from hard law to a broader notion of authority, and from the state to a pluralistic, cosmopolitan world order composed of multiple overlapping communities. A community is characterised by communicative action and a common identity. In such a setting, public authority is the authority exercised on behalf of a community in relation to its members. In relation to non-members, the same act may constitute an exercise of private authority. It is a different question whether such authority is legitimate. Some examples illustrate the approach
Civil society · Corporate governance · Democracy · Global governance · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Liberalism · Political science · Politics · Private law · Public law · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Public Administration
Cosmopolitan democracy
Transnationales Verwaltungsrecht
Ambivalenzen der Ordnung
How International Law Works
Histoire de la sexualité
Global Legal Pluralism
Four Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Die verfassungstheoretische Unterscheidung von Staat und Gesellschaft als Bedingung der individuellen Freiheit
Socializing States
Governance, order, and change in world politics
Governance without Government
Global Stakeholder Democracy
Steuerungsdiskussion, Systemtheorie und Parlamentarismuskritik
Governance by Indicators
Democracy and Difference
Legality and LegitimacyCarl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen, and Hermann Heller in Weimar
The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism
The Human Condition
The Human Condition
On cosmopolitan self-determination
How large is the world of global constitutionalism
Constitutional pluralism
The non-existence of private self-regulation in the transnational sphere and its implications for the responsibility to procure legitimacy
There is no global public
International authority and its politicization
Toward global checks and balances
The Emergence of Global Administrative Law
The Administrative Law of Global Private-Public Regulation
The Legitimacy of International Law
The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions
The Decay of Consent
Remedying Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance
Sources of the self
Let's Argue
The Constitutionalization of International Law and the Legitimation Problems of a Constitution for World Society
The Legitimation of International Governance
Arguing, Bargaining and all that
Private International Law Beyond the Schism
Between Facts and Norms
Breaking Frames
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |