The Ambiguities of Amending Historical Injustices and Espousing a Shared Collective Memory

The WWII Forced Labour Narratives in Germany and Japan

Bibliographic Data

ID13009229
AuthorsPatrick Hein (0000-0002-0133-4403, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume9
Issue1
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueState Crime Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2046-6056 • E-ISSN: 2046-6064
PublisherPluto Journals (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.13169/statecrime.9.1.0047
OpenAlexW3081261254
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited18

This paper examines WWII forced labour memory politics in Germany and Japan by drawing from Barkan’s concept of amending historical injustices. After lengthy negotiations, Germany reached in 2000 a milestone agreement compensating victims individually, while in Japan, settlements, consolation payments and apologies have been overshadowed by a revival of revisionist historical narratives and victim denial. It is argued that the official recognition of forced labour as historical injustice made a mutually acceptable outcome possible in Germany and helped to shape a genuine historical memory in victim nations. In Japan, by contrast, an alliance of politicians, bureaucrats and academics has been reconsecrating revisionism as official position. The revisionist inability to recognize victims and admit mistakes has implications for South Korea as the rift between right-wing pro-revisionists and left-wing nationalists divides the country and prevents the formation of a shared collective memory. Unintended consequences have dimmed prospects for a settlement

Disarmament · Economics · Injustice · Negotiation · Payment · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Settlement (finance · Sociology · World War II · European history and politics · Japanese History and Culture · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Law

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access