Privileging biological or residential obligations in separated families

Child maintenance policy approaches in 12 countries

Bibliographic Data

ID13009503
AuthorsD R Meyer (0000-0002-3966-0861, University of Wisconsin–Madison, corresponding author), Christine Skinner (University of York)
Year2014
Volume5
Issue1
Pages79-95
Publication date2014-11-04
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueFamilies Relationships and Societies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2046-7435 • E-ISSN: 2046-7443
PublisherPolicy Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1332/204674314x14128653771806
OpenAlexW4243881803
LanguageEN
Citations received8

Children’s living arrangements have become increasingly complex over the last decades, with more children born to parents who do not live together and, even among those born to parents who do live together, increasing numbers are experiencing their parents separating and one or both re-partnering. These changes raise questions about who has financial responsibility for the children. In this article we conceptualise how different child maintenance schemes might deal with six common family transitions, focusing on the extent to which responsibilities are organised according to biology or residence. We then investigate the child maintenance policies in place in 12 countries, and use the results to categorise countries into five child maintenance schemes. Finally, we compare the child maintenance scheme with the level of family complexity in each country to see if countries with the highest levels of complexity tend to organise responsibility differently

Business · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Political science · Residence · Sociology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Demography · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub