The Allen Report
Class, gender and disadvantage
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13009604 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chris Grover (0000-0002-3398-5403, Lancaster University, corresponding author), Claire Mason (0000-0002-4412-5142, Lancaster University) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 355-369 |
| Publication date | 2013-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Families Relationships and Societies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2046-7435 • E-ISSN: 2046-7443 |
| Publisher | Policy Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1332/204674313x669829 |
| OpenAlex | W2051868964 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
In this article we focus on the Allen Report, which, along with other documents, is helping to guide the development of the United Kingdom’s coalition government’s policies in relation to child poverty and social mobility. Drawing on empirical research projects with social work service users and practitioners, we take a critical approach to the way in which the Allen Report locates the disadvantages faced by working-class children in the parenting practices and actions of their mothers. We argue that the Allen Report helps to encode working-class mothers as being problematic and is part of a long tradition in which elites link notions of respectability to the parenting and housekeeping skills of mothers. In this context, the article examines the ways in which the Allen Report fails to acknowledge the needs of income-poor working-class mothers and denies the importance of material conditions to mothering
Class (philosophy · Context (archaeology · Disadvantage · Epistemology · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Public relations · Sociology · Working class · Gender Studies · Law · Research in Social Sciences · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,42 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2020 (7) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |