Impacts of ecosystem vitality on Asean’s agricultural exports
A System Generalized Method of Moments approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13010672 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nguyen Khanh Doanh (0000-0002-5052-908X), Nguyen Ngoc Quynh (0000-0003-0891-5275, Thai Nguyen University), Yoon Heo (0000-0001-7928-2773, Sogang University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 335-351 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Area Studies Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2049-1123 • E-ISSN: 2233-8659 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2233865920957209 |
| OpenAlex | W3131558787 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
This study examined the impact of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)’s ecosystem vitality (EV) on its agricultural exports to the rest of the world. Using a sample of the six major ASEAN countries (ASEAN-6) (including Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam) and their 72 trading partners for the period 2007–2016, we found robust evidence of a positive relationship between the quality of EV and the volume of agricultural exports. At the sectoral level, the quality of EV had the most substantial effects on the ASEAN’s exports of SITC-0 (food and live animals) and exerted the least impact on the ASEAN’s exports of SITC-2 (crude materials, inedible, except fuels). This empirical evidence implies that natural resource-intensive products are more sensitive to the quality of EV. At the country level, EV has the most potent effect on the ASEAN’s agricultural exports to high-income countries and the least impact on the ASEAN’s agricultural exports to low-income countries. To promote agricultural exports, especially to high-income countries, our empirical results suggest that ASEAN countries need to build specific and effective plans for conservation of environment and management of sustainable ecosystems. JEL Classification: C33, F14, and Q56
Agricultural economics · Agriculture · Business · Economics · Empirical evidence · Geography · International trade · Natural resource economics · Vitality · Economic and Technological Innovation · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Global trade and economics
Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution
Managing nitrogen for sustainable development
Unit root tests for panel data
The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
The Estimation of Economic Relationships using Instrumental Variables
Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability
Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv
Climate change impacts on crop productivity in Africa and South Asia
High-resolution model for estimating the economic and policy implications of agricultural soil salinization in California
Determinants of demand for green products
Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture
Exploring the Links between Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements and Merchandise Trade
Forest change and agricultural productivity
The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018
Firms in International Trade
Trade and Environmental Diplomacy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |