Is Afta a Desirable Regional Trade Agreement for Asean
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13010674 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Innwon Park (0000-0001-8567-7907, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 49-72 |
| Publication date | 2011-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Area Studies Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2049-1123 • E-ISSN: 2233-8659 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/223386591101400404 |
| OpenAlex | W2144499778 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 14 |
This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Association of Southeast Asian Nation (ASEAN) in liberalizing trade and investment through regional economic cooperation. We test whether the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) satisfies necessary conditions for a trade bloc to generate a positive and sufficient net trade creation effect by calculating trade-related indices introduced by the theory of economic integration. We find that ASEAN economies might not satisfy most of the conditions for creating positive welfare gains from AFTA. Moreover, in order to search for a desirable regional trade agreement (RTA) in the East Asian region, this study considers alternative strategies beyond AFTA, such as the currently implemented ASEAN hub (three sets of ASEAN+1: ASEAN+China, ASEAN+Japan, and ASEAN+Korea) RTA and a proposed ASEAN+3 (including ASEAN, China, Japan, and Korea) RTA. Although the ASEAN hub RTA appears to be a better policy option for ASEAN, it is not necessarily desirable for the region when we consider the neighboring countries in Northeast Asia as spokes. Therefore, we propose that the ASEAN+3 RTA, covering 10 ASEAN member countries and the three Northeast Asian countries, is a more desirable RTA in East Asia
Business · China · East Asia · Economic integration · Economics · Free trade · Geography · International economics · International free trade agreement · International trade · Investment (military · Order (exchange · Political science · Regional trade · Rules of origin · Trade creation · Trade diversion · Economic Policies and Impacts · Global Financial Crisis and Policies · Global trade and economics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|