Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Public perceptions of television and online political advertising

Bibliographic Data

ID13016751
AuthorsTravis N Ridout (0000-0003-3268-4358, Washington State University, corresponding author), Michael M Franz (0000-0001-5996-075X, Bowdoin College), Erika Franklin Fowler (0000-0003-3141-572X, Wesleyan University), Taewoo Kang (0000-0002-4556-9319, Siena College)
Year2024
Volume11
Issue2
Publication date2024-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueResearch & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2053-1680 • E-ISSN: 2053-1680
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/20531680241263766
OpenAlexW4399909896
LanguageEN
References cited18

For decades, television has dominated political advertising, but that is changing due to the rise of advertising online and on social and digital media. How do people view online political advertising and how does this compare to their views of television advertising? To address these questions, we examine a nationally representative survey of 1200 U.S. adults that was fielded in February 2021. The survey contains an experiment in which the description of advertising (generic, television, or online) is altered. We find, in general, that people view online advertising more favorably than television advertising. We also find that, in some instances, age influences views of advertising. This study provides some of the first evidence of how Americans view online political advertising. Understanding what people think about online advertising can shed light on the potential impacts of online ad exposure, such as persuasion and participation, and people’s attitudes toward online advertising should inform proposals for its regulation

Advertising · Business · Media studies · Perception · Political advertising · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Public relations · Sociology · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Social Media and Politics

  • Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance

    Steven M Edwards, Hairong Li et al.•Journal of Advertising•2002

  • The Effects of Negative Comparative Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluations and Advertising Evaluations

    Bruce E Pinkleton, Bruce Pinkleton•Journal of Advertising•1997

  • Voter Responses to Negative Political Ads

    Open Access•Gina M Garramone•Journalism Quarterly•1984

  • Misleading political advertising fuels incivility online

    Open Access•Yingying Chen, Luping Wang et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments

    Open Access•Kevin Coe, Kate Kenski et al.•Journal of Communication•2014

  • Spending Fast and Furious

    Open Access•Travis N Ridout, Erika Franklin Fowler et al.•The Forum•2021

  • Does digital advertising affect vote choice? Evidence from a randomized field experiment

    Open Access•Alexander Coppock, Donald P Green et al.•Research & Politics•2022

  • Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers

    Open Access•C P Ruiz, David Domingo et al.•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Spiraling downward

    Open Access•Tom Dobber, Damian Trilling et al.•New Media & Society•2018

  • Online Incivility in the 2020 Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Michael Heseltine, Spencer Dorsey•Political Research Quarterly•2022

  • Political Advertising Online and Offline

    Open Access•Erika Franklin Fowler, Michael M Franz et al.•American Political Science Review•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae