Endorsements from Republican politicians can increase confidence in U.S. elections
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13016792 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katherine Clayton (0000-0003-0740-5230, Stanford University, corresponding author), R Willer (0000-0003-3404-6472, Stanford University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Research & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-1680 • E-ISSN: 2053-1680 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20531680221148967 |
| OpenAlex | W4313908247 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 10 |
Since the 2020 U.S. presidential election, perceptions of the validity of the outcome and broader trust in the American electoral process have reached historically low levels among Republicans. While this trend has potentially harmful consequences for democratic stability, there is little research on how beliefs that an election was fair—and trust in the electoral process more generally—can be restored. In a preregistered survey experiment ( n = 2101), we find that viewing real messages from Republican politicians defending the legitimacy of the 2020 election increased faith in the election’s outcome and in the broader electoral process among Republican voters, compared to either a neutral control condition or to comparable messages from Democratic politicians. These effects are statistically mediated by shifts in voters’ perceptions of elite Republican opinion about the 2020 election, highlighting a potentially useful intervention for efforts to restore faith in elections going forward. Notably, exposure to messages from Republican politicians affirming the election’s legitimacy did not significantly decrease support for the Republican Party, suggesting that Republican politicians who endorse the 2020 election results might not face backlash from voters
Democracy · Elite · Legitimacy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics
The winner–loser gap in democratic attitudes among politicians
Can Public Information Campaigns Restore Trust in American Elections Across Polarized State and Party Lines?
Zimbabwe opposition’s quest for electoral reforms in the post-GNU era
Understanding public attitudes toward restrictive voting laws in the United States
Levels of Office and Voter Accountability for Democratic Norm Violations
The Way Back After Backsliding
Election Denial as a News Coverage Dilemma
Elections Without Constraints? The Appeal of Electoral Autocracy Across the World
Unsuccessful Candidates Are More Concerned About Electoral Fairness than Election Winners
Trust in the Count
Autocratization Spillover
From Confidence to Convenience
Good Sports or Sore Losers
Countering Authoritarian Behavior in Democracies
Sore losers on election night? Examining the temporal emergence of the winner–loser gap
Can Official Messaging on Trust in Elections Break Through Partisan Polarization
Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms
Equivalence Tests
Losers' Consent
Partisanship and confidence in the vote count
Donald Trump and the Lie
Partisan Elites as Culprits? How Party Cues Shape Partisan Perceptual Gaps
Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments
Expressive Partisanship
How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
| Citations per year | 5.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |